Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Efficient Adaptation in Mixed-Motive Environments via Hierarchical Opponent Modeling and Planning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.08002 v2 pith:4QGAMCCR submitted 2024-06-12 cs.AI cs.MA

classification cs.AIcs.MA
keywords environmentsmixed-motivemodelingopponentplanningadaptationapproachmodule
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the recent successes of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms, efficiently adapting to co-players in mixed-motive environments remains a significant challenge. One feasible approach is to hierarchically model co-players' behavior based on inferring their characteristics. However, these methods often encounter difficulties in efficient reasoning and utilization of inferred information. To address these issues, we propose Hierarchical Opponent modeling and Planning (HOP), a novel multi-agent decision-making algorithm that enables few-shot adaptation to unseen policies in mixed-motive environments. HOP is hierarchically composed of two modules: an opponent modeling module that infers others' goals and learns corresponding goal-conditioned policies, and a planning module that employs Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to identify the best response. Our approach improves efficiency by updating beliefs about others' goals both across and within episodes and by using information from the opponent modeling module to guide planning. Experimental results demonstrate that in mixed-motive environments, HOP exhibits superior few-shot adaptation capabilities when interacting with various unseen agents, and excels in self-play scenarios. Furthermore, the emergence of social intelligence during our experiments underscores the potential of our approach in complex multi-agent environments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are the Values of LLMs Structurally Aligned with Humans? A Causal Perspective

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A dependency graph of 17 values learned from two LLMs predicts side effects of role and SAE steering, but the causal and human-alignment claims are unsupported.

Pith tools