Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Qualitative Data Analysis in Software Engineering: Techniques and Teaching Insights

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.08228 v1 pith:M2VT3Q2F submitted 2024-06-12 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords qualitativedatasoftwareanalysisartifactschaptercodingcredibility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Software repositories are rich sources of qualitative artifacts, including source code comments, commit messages, issue descriptions, and documentation. These artifacts offer many interesting insights when analyzed through quantitative methods, as outlined in the chapter on mining software repositories. This chapter shifts the focus towards interpreting these artifacts using various qualitative data analysis techniques. We introduce qualitative coding as an iterative process, which is crucial not only for educational purposes but also to enhance the credibility and depth of research findings. Various coding methods are discussed along with the strategic design of a coding guide to ensure consistency and accuracy in data interpretation. The chapter also discusses quality assurance in qualitative data analysis, emphasizing principles such as credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. These principles are vital to ensure that the findings are robust and can be generalized in different contexts. By sharing best practices and lessons learned, we aim to equip all readers with the tools necessary to conduct rigorous qualitative research in the field of software engineering.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Inductive to Deductive: LLMs-Based Qualitative Data Analysis in Requirements Engineering

    cs.SE 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    GPT-4 labels software requirements with substantial agreement to human analysts (Cohen's Kappa up to 0.738) when given detailed few-shot prompts, while zero-shot performance is only moderate.

Pith tools