REVIEW 2 cited by
LaMOT: Language-Guided Multi-Object Tracking
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Vision-Language MOT is a crucial tracking problem and has drawn increasing attention recently. It aims to track objects based on human language commands, replacing the traditional use of templates or pre-set information from training sets in conventional tracking tasks. Despite various efforts, a key challenge lies in the lack of a clear understanding of why language is used for tracking, which hinders further development in this field. In this paper, we address this challenge by introducing Language-Guided MOT, a unified task framework, along with a corresponding large-scale benchmark, termed LaMOT, which encompasses diverse scenarios and language descriptions. Specially, LaMOT comprises 1,660 sequences from 4 different datasets and aims to unify various Vision-Language MOT tasks while providing a standardized evaluation platform. To ensure high-quality annotations, we manually assign appropriate descriptive texts to each target in every video and conduct careful inspection and correction. To the best of our knowledge, LaMOT is the first benchmark dedicated to Language-Guided MOT. Additionally, we propose a simple yet effective tracker, termed LaMOTer. By establishing a unified task framework, providing challenging benchmarks, and offering insights for future algorithm design and evaluation, we expect to contribute to the advancement of research in Vision-Language MOT. We will release the data at https://github.com/Nathan-Li123/LaMOT.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MentalThink: Shaping Thoughts in Mental SVG World
MLLMs that generate and render SVG sketches as multi-turn intermediate reasoning steps reach 55.1% on VSIBench and 76.0% on MindCube, far above the Qwen2.5-VL-7B backbone.
-
Cross-View Referring Multi-Object Tracking
The authors propose the CRMOT task, the CRTrack benchmark of 13 scenes and 221 language descriptions, and the CRTracker method, which combines CrossMOT-style tracking with APTM text-image matching.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.