Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Turns Out I'm Not Real: Towards Robust Detection of AI-Generated Videos

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.09601 v1 pith:F6UJSHIR submitted 2024-06-13 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords videosvideodiffusion-generateddetectorsframessotaaccuracycreation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The impressive achievements of generative models in creating high-quality videos have raised concerns about digital integrity and privacy vulnerabilities. Recent works to combat Deepfakes videos have developed detectors that are highly accurate at identifying GAN-generated samples. However, the robustness of these detectors on diffusion-generated videos generated from video creation tools (e.g., SORA by OpenAI, Runway Gen-2, and Pika, etc.) is still unexplored. In this paper, we propose a novel framework for detecting videos synthesized from multiple state-of-the-art (SOTA) generative models, such as Stable Video Diffusion. We find that the SOTA methods for detecting diffusion-generated images lack robustness in identifying diffusion-generated videos. Our analysis reveals that the effectiveness of these detectors diminishes when applied to out-of-domain videos, primarily because they struggle to track the temporal features and dynamic variations between frames. To address the above-mentioned challenge, we collect a new benchmark video dataset for diffusion-generated videos using SOTA video creation tools. We extract representation within explicit knowledge from the diffusion model for video frames and train our detector with a CNN + LSTM architecture. The evaluation shows that our framework can well capture the temporal features between frames, achieves 93.7% detection accuracy for in-domain videos, and improves the accuracy of out-domain videos by up to 16 points.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rethinking the Readout: Unlocking Video Backbones for AI-Generated Video Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Replacing the global-pooling readout of a frozen video backbone with a velocity-gated, per-channel-magnitude readout improves AI-generated video detection cross-generator accuracy by several AUC points.

  2. Detecting AI-Generated Video: A Vision-Language Dual-View Survey

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AIGC-V detection should be treated as factual fidelity verification and organized by a four-layer vision-language dual-view taxonomy spanning cues, motion, cross-modal consistency, and world-level reasoning.

  3. BrokenVideos: A Benchmark Dataset for Fine-Grained Artifact Localization in AI-Generated Videos

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces a 3,254-video benchmark with pixel-level artifact masks for AI-generated video, and reports that fine-tuning on it improves artifact localization.

  4. DAVID-XR1: Detecting AI-Generated Videos with Explainable Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A video-language model fine-tuned on a new defect-annotated dataset detects AI-generated videos from unseen generators with 76.7% accuracy and gives written explanations, though the test set is small and the dataset i...

Pith tools