Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Better LLM Evaluator for Text Generation: The Impact of Prompt Output Sequencing and Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.09972 v1 pith:MGBCFU5P submitted 2024-06-14 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords promptllmsscoringtextdifferentevaluationgenerationoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This research investigates prompt designs of evaluating generated texts using large language models (LLMs). While LLMs are increasingly used for scoring various inputs, creating effective prompts for open-ended text evaluation remains challenging due to model sensitivity and subjectivity in evaluation of text generation. Our study experimented with different prompt structures, altering the sequence of output instructions and including explanatory reasons. We found that the order of presenting reasons and scores significantly influences LLMs' scoring, with a different level of rule understanding in the prompt. An additional optimization may enhance scoring alignment if sufficient data is available. This insight is crucial for improving the accuracy and consistency of LLM-based evaluations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Decision Information Meets Large Language Models: The Future of Explainable Operations Research

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LLM framework that couples what-if analysis with graph edit distance on linear programs can generate more accurate and more detailed explanations for operations research queries than existing LLM baselines.

Pith tools