REVIEW 1 cited by
A Better LLM Evaluator for Text Generation: The Impact of Prompt Output Sequencing and Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This research investigates prompt designs of evaluating generated texts using large language models (LLMs). While LLMs are increasingly used for scoring various inputs, creating effective prompts for open-ended text evaluation remains challenging due to model sensitivity and subjectivity in evaluation of text generation. Our study experimented with different prompt structures, altering the sequence of output instructions and including explanatory reasons. We found that the order of presenting reasons and scores significantly influences LLMs' scoring, with a different level of rule understanding in the prompt. An additional optimization may enhance scoring alignment if sufficient data is available. This insight is crucial for improving the accuracy and consistency of LLM-based evaluations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Decision Information Meets Large Language Models: The Future of Explainable Operations Research
An LLM framework that couples what-if analysis with graph edit distance on linear programs can generate more accurate and more detailed explanations for operations research queries than existing LLM baselines.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.