REVIEW 10 cited by
A Survey on Human Preference Learning for Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The recent surge of versatile large language models (LLMs) largely depends on aligning increasingly capable foundation models with human intentions by preference learning, enhancing LLMs with excellent applicability and effectiveness in a wide range of contexts. Despite the numerous related studies conducted, a perspective on how human preferences are introduced into LLMs remains limited, which may prevent a deeper comprehension of the relationships between human preferences and LLMs as well as the realization of their limitations. In this survey, we review the progress in exploring human preference learning for LLMs from a preference-centered perspective, covering the sources and formats of preference feedback, the modeling and usage of preference signals, as well as the evaluation of the aligned LLMs. We first categorize the human feedback according to data sources and formats. We then summarize techniques for human preferences modeling and compare the advantages and disadvantages of different schools of models. Moreover, we present various preference usage methods sorted by the objectives to utilize human preference signals. Finally, we summarize some prevailing approaches to evaluate LLMs in terms of alignment with human intentions and discuss our outlooks on the human intention alignment for LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
Internal Pluralism and the Limits of Pairwise Comparisons
Under internal pluralism, forced local pairwise comparisons erase inseparable priorities and distort conflicted answers, while allowing indecision reports can sharply reduce queries needed to learn preference weights.
-
Internal Pluralism and the Limits of Pairwise Comparisons
Local pairwise comparisons are provably blind to perfectly inseparable priorities and can distort conflicted preferences, but allowing indecision reports speeds up simulated preference learning.
-
EyeMulator: Improving Code Language Models by Mimicking Human Visual Attention
EyeMulator augments CodeLLM fine-tuning loss with token weights derived from human eye-tracking scan paths, producing large gains on code translation and summarization across StarCoder, Llama-3.2 and DeepSeek-Coder.
-
Label Effects: Shared Heuristic Reliance in Trust Assessment by Humans and LLM-as-a-Judge
Both humans and LLMs trust content more when labeled human-authored than AI-generated, with LLMs showing denser attention to labels and higher uncertainty under AI labels, mirroring human heuristic patterns.
-
Can LLMs Make (Personalized) Access Control Decisions?
LLMs reflect users' privacy preferences in access control decisions with up to 86% agreement and can promote safer behavior, but personalization trades off higher individual match for potentially less secure results w...
-
BV-Blend: Uncertainty-Weighted Historical Baselines for Stable Critic-Free RL with Verifiable Rewards
BV-Blend blends prompt-local and semantic-cluster historical reward statistics via SEM-derived weights to stabilize critic-free RL advantage estimation.
-
Large Language Models for Next-Generation Wireless Network Management: A Survey and Tutorial
A survey and tutorial that organizes LLM-enabled wireless network optimization into formulation, solution, and verification stages, with case studies drawn from the authors' own prior papers.
-
Toward Human-Centered Multi-Agent Systems: Integrating Cognition, Culture, Values, and Cooperation in AI Agents
A survey arguing that multi-agent AI systems remain task-centric and lack integrated computational models of human cognition, culture, values, and social cooperation.
-
Toward Human-Centered Multi-Agent Systems: Integrating Cognition, Culture, Values, and Cooperation in AI Agents
A literature survey across cognitive science, sociolinguistics, and AI alignment that identifies the absence of unified frameworks for embedding cognition, culture, values, and cooperation into multi-agent LLM systems...
-
Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Models: A Survey of Advancements and Applications Across the LLM Lifecycle
A survey that maps reinforcement learning methods, datasets, benchmarks, and open-source tools across the full training lifecycle of large language models, focusing on verifiable-reward reasoning.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.