REVIEW 3 cited by
An Internal Model Principle For Robots
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
When designing a robot's internal system, one often makes assumptions about the structure of the intended environment of the robot. One may even assign meaning to various internal components of the robot in terms of expected environmental correlates. In this paper we want to make the distinction between robot's internal and external worlds clear-cut. Can the robot learn about its environment, relying only on internally available information, including the sensor data? Are there mathematical conditions on the internal robot system which can be internally verified and make the robot's internal system mirror the structure of the environment? We prove that sufficiency is such a mathematical principle, and mathematically describe the emergence of the robot's internal structure isomorphic or bisimulation equivalent to that of the environment. A connection to the free-energy principle is established, when sufficiency is interpreted as a limit case of surprise minimization. As such, we show that surprise minimization leads to having an internal model isomorphic to the environment. This also parallels the Good Regulator Principle which states that controlling a system sufficiently well means having a model of it. Unlike the mentioned theories, ours is discrete, and non-probabilistic.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Semantic Communication meets System 2 ML: How Abstraction, Compositionality and Emergent Languages Shape Intelligence
The paper proposes a research vision in which 6G networks and AI agents communicate through semantic abstractions composed algebraically, guided by Kahneman's System 1 versus System 2 distinction.
-
Resilient-Native and Intelligent Next-Generation Wireless Systems: Key Enablers, Foundations, and Applications
Resilience in wireless networks is formalized through recoverability and durability across four mathematical lenses and illustrated with simulation-based use cases.
-
Resilient-native and Intelligent NextG Systems
A position paper defining resilience for 6G networks as resisting, recovering from, and adapting to unforeseen disruptions, with a proposed multi-disciplinary mathematical toolkit.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.