Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12027 v2 pith:UPRUWHT2 submitted 2024-06-17 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords artistsadversarialmimicryperturbationsprotectionscannotexistinggenerative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artists are increasingly concerned about advancements in image generation models that can closely replicate their unique artistic styles. In response, several protection tools against style mimicry have been developed that incorporate small adversarial perturbations into artworks published online. In this work, we evaluate the effectiveness of popular protections -- with millions of downloads -- and show they only provide a false sense of security. We find that low-effort and "off-the-shelf" techniques, such as image upscaling, are sufficient to create robust mimicry methods that significantly degrade existing protections. Through a user study, we demonstrate that all existing protections can be easily bypassed, leaving artists vulnerable to style mimicry. We caution that tools based on adversarial perturbations cannot reliably protect artists from the misuse of generative AI, and urge the development of alternative non-technological solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Anti-Tamper Protection for Unauthorized Individual Image Generation

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ATP embeds a fragile authorization message in the frequency domain of a protected photo so that any purification attempt corrupts the message and triggers rejection by the generation service.

  2. Is Perturbation-Based Image Protection Disruptive to Image Editing?

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Perturbation-based protections do not reliably block diffusion editing, and in many cases they increase the edited image's alignment with the guidance prompt.

Pith tools