Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

On-Policy Self-Alignment with Fine-grained Knowledge Feedback for Hallucination Mitigation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12221 v6 pith:UCAXWRF5 submitted 2024-06-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords feedbackknowledgefine-grainedhallucinationrlfhbehaviorboundariesenables
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Hallucination occurs when large language models exhibit behavior that deviates from the boundaries of their knowledge during response generation. To address this critical issue, previous learning-based methods attempt to finetune models but are limited by off-policy sampling and coarse-grained feedback. In this paper, we present \textit{\b{R}einforcement \b{L}earning \b{f}or \b{H}allucination} (RLFH), an on-policy self-alignment approach that enables LLMs to actively explore their knowledge boundaries and self-correct generation behavior through fine-grained feedback signals. RLFH introduces a self-assessment framework where the policy serves as its own judge. Through this framework, responses are automatically decomposed into atomic facts and their truthfulness and informativeness are assessed against external knowledge sources. The resulting fine-grained feedback at the statement level are then converted into token-level dense reward signals. This enables online reinforcement learning to achieve precise and timely optimization without human intervention. Comprehensive evaluations on HotpotQA, SQuADv2, and Biography benchmarks validate RLFH's effectiveness in hallucination mitigation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DeepRAG: Thinking to Retrieve Step by Step for Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A retrieval-augmented QA system that learns when to retrieve at each reasoning step outperforms adaptive RAG baselines on six benchmarks.

  2. Search, Verify and Feedback: Towards Next Generation Post-training Paradigm of Foundation Models via Verifier Engineering

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey and position paper that reframes post-training of foundation models as a search, verify, and feedback pipeline called verifier engineering.

  3. Sailing by the Stars: A Survey on Reward Models and Learning Strategies for Learning from Rewards

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A single-author survey that taxonomizes reward-model design and learning strategies across training, inference, and post-inference for LLMs.

Pith tools