Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

RichRAG: Crafting Rich Responses for Multi-faceted Queries in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12566 v3 pith:XAFGEC2W submitted 2024-06-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords documentsresponsesrichusersanswersaspectscomprehensivediverse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) effectively addresses issues of static knowledge and hallucination in large language models. Existing studies mostly focus on question scenarios with clear user intents and concise answers. However, it is prevalent that users issue broad, open-ended queries with diverse sub-intents, for which they desire rich and long-form answers covering multiple relevant aspects. To tackle this important yet underexplored problem, we propose a novel RAG framework, namely RichRAG. It includes a sub-aspect explorer to identify potential sub-aspects of input questions, a multi-faceted retriever to build a candidate pool of diverse external documents related to these sub-aspects, and a generative list-wise ranker, which is a key module to provide the top-k most valuable documents for the final generator. These ranked documents sufficiently cover various query aspects and are aware of the generator's preferences, hence incentivizing it to produce rich and comprehensive responses for users. The training of our ranker involves a supervised fine-tuning stage to ensure the basic coverage of documents, and a reinforcement learning stage to align downstream LLM's preferences to the ranking of documents. Experimental results on two publicly available datasets prove that our framework effectively and efficiently provides comprehensive and satisfying responses to users.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CTR-Guided Generative Query Suggestion in Conversational Search

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GQS combines multi-source CTR prediction, CTR-weighted DPO, and iterative calibration, reporting higher CTR, relevance, and diversity for query suggestions on two Baidu conversational-search tasks.

  2. Iterative Self-Incentivization Empowers Large Language Models as Agentic Searchers

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    EXSEARCH trains LLMs for agentic search by treating search trajectories as latent variables and optimizing a weighted likelihood via expectation-maximization, yielding gains on NQ, HotpotQA, MuSiQue, and 2WikiQA.

  3. Question Decomposition for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Splitting multi-hop questions into subquestions and reranking the merged retrieval pool improves RAG evidence coverage and answer accuracy on MultiHop-RAG and HotpotQA.

Pith tools