Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Proving Olympiad Algebraic Inequalities without Human Demonstrations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.14219 v2 pith:4BMNKPNF submitted 2024-06-20 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords mathematicalinequalityolympiad-levelproblemsaipsalgebraichumanolympiad
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Solving Olympiad-level mathematical problems represents a significant advancement in machine intelligence and automated reasoning. Current machine learning methods, however, struggle to solve Olympiad-level problems beyond Euclidean plane geometry due to a lack of large-scale, high-quality datasets. The challenge is even greater in algebraic systems, which involve infinite reasoning spaces within finite conditions. To address these issues, we propose AIPS, an Algebraic Inequality Proving System capable of autonomously generating complex inequality theorems and effectively solving Olympiad-level inequality problems without requiring human demonstrations. During proof search in a mixed reasoning manner, a value curriculum learning strategy on generated datasets is implemented to improve proving performance, demonstrating strong mathematical intuitions. On a test set of 20 International Mathematical Olympiad-level inequality problems, AIPS successfully solved 10, outperforming state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, AIPS automatically generated a vast array of non-trivial theorems without human intervention, some of which have been evaluated by professional contestants and deemed to reach the level of the International Mathematical Olympiad. Notably, one theorem was selected as a competition problem in a major city 2024 Mathematical Olympiad.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Proposing and solving olympiad geometry with guided tree search

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    TongGeometry solves every problem in the IMO-AG-30 geometry benchmark and uses its search engine to propose olympiad problems, several accepted by real competitions.

  2. A Survey of Mathematical Reasoning in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Model: Benchmark, Method & Challenges

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that structures multimodal large language model research for mathematical reasoning into benchmarks, three methodological paradigms, and seven open challenges, claiming to be the first of its kind.

Pith tools