REVIEW 2 cited by
AGDA+: Proximal Alternating Gradient Descent Ascent Method with a Nonmonotone Adaptive Step-Size Search for Nonconvex Minimax Problems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We consider double-regularized nonconvex-strongly concave (NCSC) minimax problems of the form $(P):\min_{x\in\mathcal{X}} \max_{y\in\mathcal{Y}}g(x)+f(x,y)-h(y)$, where $g$, $h$ are closed convex, $f$ is $L$-smooth in $(x,y)$ and strongly concave in $y$. We propose a proximal alternating gradient descent ascent method AGDA+ that can adaptively choose nonmonotone primal-dual stepsizes to compute an approximate stationary point for $(P)$ without requiring the knowledge of the global Lipschitz constant $L$ and the concavity modulus $\mu$. Using a nonmonotone step-size search (backtracking) scheme, AGDA+ stands out by its ability to exploit the local Lipschitz structure and eliminates the need for precise tuning of hyper-parameters. AGDA+ achieves the optimal iteration complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-2})$ and it is the first step-size search method for NCSC minimax problems that require only $3$ calls to $\nabla f$ on average per backtracking iteration. The numerical experiments demonstrate its robustness and efficiency.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
An Intelligent Fault Self-Healing Mechanism for Cloud AI Systems via Integration of Large Language Models and Deep Reinforcement Learning
An LLM-plus-deep-RL hybrid is proposed for cloud fault self-healing, claiming 37% faster recovery on unknown faults with weak experimental documentation.
-
Anomaly Detection and Early Warning Mechanism for Intelligent Monitoring Systems in Multi-Cloud Environments Based on LLM
A CNN-LSTM-LLM-deep SVM hybrid is proposed for multi-cloud anomaly detection, but the evaluation is qualitative and Equation (8) is mathematically wrong.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.