Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ACR: A Benchmark for Automatic Cohort Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.14780 v2 pith:2CNLIB55 submitted 2024-06-20 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords retrievalcohortautomaticbenchmarkdatasetextensivehealthcarellms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Identifying patient cohorts is fundamental to numerous healthcare tasks, including clinical trial recruitment and retrospective studies. Current cohort retrieval methods in healthcare organizations rely on automated queries of structured data combined with manual curation, which are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and often yield low-quality results. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) and information retrieval (IR) offer promising avenues to revolutionize these systems. Major challenges include managing extensive eligibility criteria and handling the longitudinal nature of unstructured Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) while ensuring that the solution remains cost-effective for real-world application. This paper introduces a new task, Automatic Cohort Retrieval (ACR), and evaluates the performance of LLMs and commercial, domain-specific neuro-symbolic approaches. We provide a benchmark task, a query dataset, an EMR dataset, and an evaluation framework. Our findings underscore the necessity for efficient, high-quality ACR systems capable of longitudinal reasoning across extensive patient databases.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Knowledge-Reasoning Dissociation: Fundamental Limitations of LLMs in Clinical Natural Language Inference

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across four clinical inference tasks, six LLMs answer paired knowledge probes at 92% accuracy but the main reasoning tasks at 25%, indicating a systematic knowledge-reasoning gap.

  2. CliniQ: A Multi-faceted Benchmark for Electronic Health Record Retrieval with Semantic Match Assessment

    cs.IR 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CliniQ is a public EHR retrieval benchmark with 77,206 LLM-annotated relevance judgments, showing that BM25 is a strong baseline and that semantic matches drive dense-retriever gains.

Pith tools