Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

UNO Arena for Evaluating Sequential Decision-Making Capability of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.16382 v1 pith:GD2UG4OU submitted 2024-06-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords sequentialdecision-makingllmscapabilityarenadecisionsgameplayer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sequential decision-making refers to algorithms that take into account the dynamics of the environment, where early decisions affect subsequent decisions. With large language models (LLMs) demonstrating powerful capabilities between tasks, we can't help but ask: Can Current LLMs Effectively Make Sequential Decisions? In order to answer this question, we propose the UNO Arena based on the card game UNO to evaluate the sequential decision-making capability of LLMs and explain in detail why we choose UNO. In UNO Arena, We evaluate the sequential decision-making capability of LLMs dynamically with novel metrics based Monte Carlo methods. We set up random players, DQN-based reinforcement learning players, and LLM players (e.g. GPT-4, Gemini-pro) for comparison testing. Furthermore, in order to improve the sequential decision-making capability of LLMs, we propose the TUTRI player, which can involves having LLMs reflect their own actions wtih the summary of game history and the game strategy. Numerous experiments demonstrate that the TUTRI player achieves a notable breakthrough in the performance of sequential decision-making compared to the vanilla LLM player.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Simple "Try Again" Can Elicit Multi-Turn LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Multi-turn RL with only unary 'try again' feedback improves multi-turn reasoning accuracy by up to 14% while preserving single-turn performance.

Pith tools