REVIEW 1 cited by
Modelling the 5G Energy Consumption using Real-world Data: Energy Fingerprint is All You Need
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The introduction of 5G technology has revolutionized communications, enabling unprecedented capacity, connectivity, and ultra-fast, reliable communications. However, this leap has led to a substantial increase in energy consumption, presenting a critical challenge for network sustainability. Accurate energy consumption modeling is essential for developing energy-efficient strategies, enabling operators to optimize resource utilization while maintaining network performance. To address this, we propose a novel deep learning model for 5G base station energy consumption estimation based on a real-world dataset. Unlike existing methods, our approach integrates the Base Station Identifier (BSID) as an input feature through an embedding layer, capturing unique energy patterns across different base stations. We further introduce a masked training method and an attention mechanism to enhance generalization and accuracy. Experimental results show significant improvements, reducing Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) from 12.75% to 4.98%, achieving over 60% performance gain compared to existing models. The source code for our model is available at https://github.com/RS2002/ARL.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CSI-4CAST: A Hybrid Deep Learning Model for CSI Prediction with Comprehensive Robustness and Generalization Testing
A hybrid CNN-ShuffleNet-Transformer model claims the best accuracy-efficiency trade-off on a new 3,060-scenario CSI prediction benchmark, but FDD gains and robustness claims rest on point estimates without error bars.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.