REVIEW 1 cited by
A New Gravitational Wave Probe to the Nature of Dark Energy from the Aging of the Universe
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
One of the most dominant energy budgets in the Universe is Dark Energy, which remains enigmatic since its existence was first claimed based on observations of late-time cosmic acceleration. We propose a new way of inferring the dark energy equation of state (EoS) by measuring the aging of the Universe using only gravitational wave (GW) signals from coalescing binary compact objects of any masses. We show that the behavior of dark energy as the Universe ages will lead to a change in the observed chirp mass of GW sources inferred from observations of different stages of their coalescence. This change can be studied by monitoring a coherent source over a few years, with two well-separated GW frequencies. With a coordinated network of GW detectors that can reach a sensitivity of Big Bang Observer, we can reach a $5\sigma$ detection of the dark energy EoS parameter $w_0=-1$ and its variation with cosmic time by using stellar origin binary black holes and binary neutron stars up to high redshift over 10 years of observation time without using any external calibrator. If the next generation of GW detectors can achieve this precision, then it can open a new window to discover the fundamental nature of dark energy.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Multi-Messenger Cosmology: A Route to Accurate Inference of Dark Energy Beyond CPL Parametrization from XG Detectors
A simulation forecast claims CE+ET bright standard sirens can measure dark energy EoS parameters with sigma(w0)=0.010, sigma(wa)=0.049, sigma(wb)=0.072, better than other planned probes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.