Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LumberChunker: Long-Form Narrative Document Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17526 v1 pith:B3UTIKUO submitted 2024-06-25 cs.CL cs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.IR
keywords lumberchunkerretrievalavailablecompetitivecontentmethodmethodsnarrative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern NLP tasks increasingly rely on dense retrieval methods to access up-to-date and relevant contextual information. We are motivated by the premise that retrieval benefits from segments that can vary in size such that a content's semantic independence is better captured. We propose LumberChunker, a method leveraging an LLM to dynamically segment documents, which iteratively prompts the LLM to identify the point within a group of sequential passages where the content begins to shift. To evaluate our method, we introduce GutenQA, a benchmark with 3000 "needle in a haystack" type of question-answer pairs derived from 100 public domain narrative books available on Project Gutenberg. Our experiments show that LumberChunker not only outperforms the most competitive baseline by 7.37% in retrieval performance (DCG@20) but also that, when integrated into a RAG pipeline, LumberChunker proves to be more effective than other chunking methods and competitive baselines, such as the Gemini 1.5M Pro. Our Code and Data are available at https://github.com/joaodsmarques/LumberChunker

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can LLMs Replace Humans During Code Chunking?

    cs.SE 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-generated partitions of legacy code yield documentation that LLM judges rate as up to 20% more factual and up to 10% more useful than documentation based on human expert partitions.

  2. Semantic Source Code Segmentation using Small and Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned encoder-only models such as CodeBERT outperform zero-shot and few-shot LLMs at semantic line-level segmentation of R code, and a new annotated R dataset, StatCodeSeg, is introduced.

  3. Knowledge Compression via Question Generation: Enhancing Multihop Document Retrieval without Fine-tuning

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A question-based document encoding with paper-cards and syntactic reranking improves RAG retrieval without fine-tuning, outperforming chunking baselines in the reported tests.

Pith tools