Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Robust integration of external control data in randomized trials

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17971 v4 pith:OMSSM2QR submitted 2024-06-25 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords controldataestimatorexternalefficienttrialestimatorswhen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

One approach for increasing the efficiency of randomized trials is the use of "external controls" -- individuals who received the control treatment studied in the trial during routine practice or in prior experimental studies. Existing external control methods, however, can be biased if the populations underlying the trial and the external control data are not exchangeable. Here, we characterize a randomization-aware class of treatment effect estimators in the population underlying the trial that remain consistent and asymptotically normal when using external control data, even when exchangeability does not hold. We consider two members of this class of estimators: the well-known augmented inverse probability weighting trial-only estimator, which is the efficient estimator when only trial data are used; and a potentially more efficient member of the class when exchangeability holds and external control data are available, which we refer to as the optimized randomization-aware estimator. To achieve robust integration of external control data in trial analyses, we then propose a combined estimator based on the efficient trial-only estimator and the optimized randomization-aware estimator. We show that the combined estimator is consistent and no less efficient than the most efficient of the two component estimators, whether the exchangeability assumption holds or not. We examine the estimators' performance in simulations and we illustrate their use with data from two trials of paliperidone extended-release for schizophrenia.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Efficient Estimation of Causal Effects Under Two-Phase Sampling with Error-Prone Outcome and Treatment Measurements

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors construct and compare two asymptotically equivalent doubly robust estimators of average treatment effects under two-phase sampling with error-prone outcome and treatment, then improve finite-sample perform...

  2. Towards Best Practices for Covariate Adjustment in Regulatory Trials: From Fixed to Data-Adaptive Approaches

    stat.ME 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Pre-specified, data-adaptive covariate adjustment can improve precision in randomized trials and support regulatory acceptance, but the paper's 'guaranteed no precision loss' wording overstates what the cited methods deliver.

Pith tools