Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Decidability of Krohn-Rhodes complexity for all finite semigroups and automata

Group Theory · Submitted 26 Jun 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The main result of this paper proves that it is decidable whether a semigroup has complexity k for any k greater than or equal to 0.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2406.18477 (version 1)
Pith ID5SDFAFER, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAnne Schilling, John Rhodes, Stuart Margolis. "Decidability of Krohn-Rhodes complexity for all finite semigroups and automata." arXiv:2406.18477 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/5SDFAFER
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,540 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.15 · states limitation 0.13 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.66 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The Krohn-Rhodes Theorem proves that a finite semigroup divides a wreath product of groups and aperiodic semigroups. Krohn-Rhodes complexity equals the minimal number of groups that are needed. Determining an algorithm to compute complexity has been an open problem for more than 50 years. The main result of this paper proves that it is decidable whether a semigroup has complexity k for any k greater than or equal to 0. This builds on our previous work for complexity 1. In that paper we proved using profinite methods and results on free Burnside semigroups by McCammond and others that the lower bound from a 2012 paper by Henckell, Rhodes and Steinberg is precise for complexity 1. In this paper we define an improved version of the lower bound from the 2012 paper and prove that it is exact for arbitrary complexity.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The Krohn-Rhodes Theorem proves that a finite semigroup divides a wreath product of groups and aperiodic semigroups. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Krohn-Rhodes complexity equals the minimal number of groups that are needed. background 1.00 0.07 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 Determining an algorithm to compute complexity has been an open problem for more than 50 years. gap 0.95 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 The main result of this paper proves that it is decidable whether a semigroup has complexity k for any k greater than or equal to 0. result 0.90 0.96 0.98 asserted 1.00
s4 This builds on our previous work for complexity 1. background 0.93 0.51 0.02 asserted 0.97
s5 In that paper we proved using profinite methods and results on free Burnside semigroups by McCammond and others that the lower bound from a 2012 paper by Henckell, Rhodes and Steinberg is precise for complexity 1. background 0.84 0.82 0.02 asserted 1.00
s6 In this paper we define an improved version of the lower bound from the 2012 paper and prove that it is exact for arbitrary complexity. contribution 0.65 0.96 0.23 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The Krohn-Rhodes Theorem proves that a finite semigroup divides a wreath product of groups and aperiodic semigroups. Krohn-Rhodes complexity equals the minimal number of groups that are needed. Determining an algorithm to compute complexity has been an open problem for more than 50 years. The main result of this paper proves that it is decidable whether a semigroup has complexity k for any k greater than or equal to 0. This builds on our previous work for complexity 1. In that paper we proved using profinite methods and results on free Burnside semigroups by McCammond and others that the lower bound from a 2012 paper by Henckell, Rhodes and Steinberg is precise for complexity 1. In this paper we define an improved version of the lower bound from the 2012 paper and prove that it is exact for arbitrary complexity.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 20 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

Papers citing it · 15 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.