Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Re-Ranking Step by Step: Investigating Pre-Filtering for Re-Ranking with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.18740 v1 pith:5BHPE63Y submitted 2024-06-26 cs.CL cs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.IR
keywords re-rankingllmsmodelslanguagelargepassagepre-filteringstep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been revolutionizing a myriad of natural language processing tasks with their diverse zero-shot capabilities. Indeed, existing work has shown that LLMs can be used to great effect for many tasks, such as information retrieval (IR), and passage ranking. However, current state-of-the-art results heavily lean on the capabilities of the LLM being used. Currently, proprietary, and very large LLMs such as GPT-4 are the highest performing passage re-rankers. Hence, users without the resources to leverage top of the line LLMs, or ones that are closed source, are at a disadvantage. In this paper, we investigate the use of a pre-filtering step before passage re-ranking in IR. Our experiments show that by using a small number of human generated relevance scores, coupled with LLM relevance scoring, it is effectively possible to filter out irrelevant passages before re-ranking. Our experiments also show that this pre-filtering then allows the LLM to perform significantly better at the re-ranking task. Indeed, our results show that smaller models such as Mixtral can become competitive with much larger proprietary models (e.g., ChatGPT and GPT-4).

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Likert or Not: LLM Absolute Relevance Judgments on Fine-Grained Ordinal Scales

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Pointwise LLM scoring with an 11-point ordinal scale is statistically competitive with listwise ranking for 31 of 40 model-dataset combinations on NDCG@10.

  2. Approximating the universal thermal climate index using sparse regression with orthogonal polynomials

    physics.ao-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper reports that sparse regression with Legendre polynomials yields UTCI approximations with lower mean error, lower root-mean-square error, and fewer large errors than the standard sixth-degree polynomial.

Pith tools