Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Assessing the Effectiveness of LLMs in Android Application Vulnerability Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.18894 v1 pith:EHXG7PAI submitted 2024-06-27 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords androidcodellmsvulnerabilitiesanalysisapplicationabilityassessing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The increasing frequency of attacks on Android applications coupled with the recent popularity of large language models (LLMs) necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the capabilities of the latter in identifying potential vulnerabilities, which is key to mitigate the overall risk. To this end, the work at hand compares the ability of nine state-of-the-art LLMs to detect Android code vulnerabilities listed in the latest Open Worldwide Application Security Project (OWASP) Mobile Top 10. Each LLM was evaluated against an open dataset of over 100 vulnerable code samples, including obfuscated ones, assessing each model's ability to identify key vulnerabilities. Our analysis reveals the strengths and weaknesses of each LLM, identifying important factors that contribute to their performance. Additionally, we offer insights into context augmentation with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for detecting Android code vulnerabilities, which in turn may propel secure application development. Finally, while the reported findings regarding code vulnerability analysis show promise, they also reveal significant discrepancies among the different LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLMs in Software Security: A Survey of Vulnerability Detection Techniques and Insights

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of LLM-based vulnerability detection covering 58 papers, with a taxonomy, dataset overview, and gap analysis, but limited by non-transparent selection and unsupported quantitative claims.

Pith tools