REVIEW 2 cited by
RuBLiMP: Russian Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Minimal pairs are a well-established approach to evaluating the grammatical knowledge of language models. However, existing resources for minimal pairs address a limited number of languages and lack diversity of language-specific grammatical phenomena. This paper introduces the Russian Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs (RuBLiMP), which includes 45k pairs of sentences that differ in grammaticality and isolate a morphological, syntactic, or semantic phenomenon. In contrast to existing benchmarks of linguistic minimal pairs, RuBLiMP is created by applying linguistic perturbations to automatically annotated sentences from open text corpora and carefully curating test data. We describe the data collection protocol and present the results of evaluating 25 language models in various scenarios. We find that the widely used language models for Russian are sensitive to morphological and agreement-oriented contrasts but fall behind humans on phenomena requiring understanding of structural relations, negation, transitivity, and tense. RuBLiMP, the codebase, and other materials are publicly available.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Spontaneous Speech Variables for Evaluating LLMs Cognitive Plausibility
Language models fine-tuned to predict speech reductions and prosodic prominences from text perform above random baselines, and models pretrained on conversational data outperform those pretrained on written data in En...
-
Explain-then-Process: Using Grammar Prompting to Enhance Grammatical Acceptability Judgments
Feeding an LLM-generated grammar explanation back to a model before a grammaticality judgment improves minimal-pair accuracy, with the largest gains for smaller models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.