Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning Methods for Modern Power Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.00304 v2 pith:AVTEA4JF submitted 2024-06-29 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords safepowersystemsactionscontroldeploymentmethodsmodern
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Given the availability of more comprehensive measurement data in modern power systems, reinforcement learning (RL) has gained significant interest in operation and control. Conventional RL relies on trial-and-error interactions with the environment and reward feedback, which often leads to exploring unsafe operating regions and executing unsafe actions, especially when deployed in real-world power systems. To address these challenges, safe RL has been proposed to optimize operational objectives while ensuring safety constraints are met, keeping actions and states within safe regions throughout both training and deployment. Rather than relying solely on manually designed penalty terms for unsafe actions, as is common in conventional RL, safe RL methods reviewed here primarily leverage advanced and proactive mechanisms. These include techniques such as Lagrangian relaxation, safety layers, and theoretical guarantees like Lyapunov functions to rigorously enforce safety boundaries. This paper provides a comprehensive review of safe RL methods and their applications across various power system operations and control domains, including security control, real-time operation, operational planning, and emerging areas. It summarizes existing safe RL techniques, evaluates their performance, analyzes suitable deployment scenarios, and examines algorithm benchmarks and application environments. The paper also highlights real-world implementation cases and identifies critical challenges such as scalability in large-scale systems and robustness under uncertainty, providing potential solutions and outlining future directions to advance the reliable integration and deployment of safe RL in modern power systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Audited Selective Verification for Risk-Controlled N-1 Thermal Contingency Screening under Deployment Shift

    eess.SY 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    A randomized audit certifies, with high confidence, that skipped N-1 contingencies violate thermal limits at most a chosen rate even under deployment shift, cutting full AC studies by 29–75% on three test systems.

  2. Universal Graph Learning for Power System Reconfigurations: Transfer Across Topology Variations

    eess.SY 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    UGCN uses shared-weight graph convolutions plus adaptive pooling and position-encoded outputs to transfer a trained model to unseen reconfigurations of power grids without retraining.

  3. Gaussian Processes in Power Systems: Techniques, Applications, and Future Works

    eess.SY 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of Gaussian process methods for power system modeling, risk assessment, and optimization, with a taxonomy of applications and challenges.

Pith tools