REVIEW 3 cited by
FairMedFM: Fairness Benchmarking for Medical Imaging Foundation Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The advent of foundation models (FMs) in healthcare offers unprecedented opportunities to enhance medical diagnostics through automated classification and segmentation tasks. However, these models also raise significant concerns about their fairness, especially when applied to diverse and underrepresented populations in healthcare applications. Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive benchmarks, standardized pipelines, and easily adaptable libraries to evaluate and understand the fairness performance of FMs in medical imaging, leading to considerable challenges in formulating and implementing solutions that ensure equitable outcomes across diverse patient populations. To fill this gap, we introduce FairMedFM, a fairness benchmark for FM research in medical imaging.FairMedFM integrates with 17 popular medical imaging datasets, encompassing different modalities, dimensionalities, and sensitive attributes. It explores 20 widely used FMs, with various usages such as zero-shot learning, linear probing, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, and prompting in various downstream tasks -- classification and segmentation. Our exhaustive analysis evaluates the fairness performance over different evaluation metrics from multiple perspectives, revealing the existence of bias, varied utility-fairness trade-offs on different FMs, consistent disparities on the same datasets regardless FMs, and limited effectiveness of existing unfairness mitigation methods. Checkout FairMedFM's project page and open-sourced codebase, which supports extendible functionalities and applications as well as inclusive for studies on FMs in medical imaging over the long term.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Distribution-aware Fairness Learning in Medical Image Segmentation From A Control-Theoretic Perspective
Attribute-conditioned mixture-of-experts gating (dMoE) improves subgroup equity in medical image segmentation, framed as mode-switching optimal control.
-
FairREAD: Re-fusing Demographic Attributes after Disentanglement for Fair Medical Image Classification
FairREAD combines disentanglement, adversarial training, and re-fusion of demographic attributes with subgroup-specific thresholds to improve the fairness-performance trade-off in chest X-ray classification.
-
Benchmarking Deep Learning Models for Laryngeal Cancer Staging Using the LaryngealCT Dataset
A curated 1,029-scan laryngeal CT benchmark with standardized 1-mm crops, six benchmarked 3D deep-learning classifiers, and open preprocessing code and metadata.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.