Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

EconNLI: Evaluating Large Language Models on Economics Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.01212 v1 pith:JIBRUOX5 submitted 2024-07-01 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords economicllmsreasoningabilityeconnlieventslanguageanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used for writing economic analysis reports or providing financial advice, but their ability to understand economic knowledge and reason about potential results of specific economic events lacks systematic evaluation. To address this gap, we propose a new dataset, natural language inference on economic events (EconNLI), to evaluate LLMs' knowledge and reasoning abilities in the economic domain. We evaluate LLMs on (1) their ability to correctly classify whether a premise event will cause a hypothesis event and (2) their ability to generate reasonable events resulting from a given premise. Our experiments reveal that LLMs are not sophisticated in economic reasoning and may generate wrong or hallucinated answers. Our study raises awareness of the limitations of using LLMs for critical decision-making involving economic reasoning and analysis. The dataset and codes are available at https://github.com/Irenehere/EconNLI.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CRMAgent: A Multi-Agent LLM System for E-Commerce CRM Message Template Generation

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-agent LLM pipeline for rewriting e-commerce CRM messages reports large quality gains, but the gains are judged by the same model that produces the rewrites, so they are not independently validated.

  2. From Text to Discovery: How Large Language Models Are Reshaping Research Across Scientific and Humanistic Disciplines

    cs.DL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    LLMs accelerate research workflows from idea generation to writing but introduce challenges like hallucination, bias, opacity, and ten systemic risks requiring new governance frameworks.

Pith tools