Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

CRAB: Cross-environment Agent Benchmark for Multimodal Language Model Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.01511 v4 pith:RKPT3BUF submitted 2024-07-01 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords crabagenttasksagentsbenchmarkenvironmentsframeworklanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The development of autonomous agents increasingly relies on Multimodal Language Models (MLMs) to perform tasks described in natural language with GUI environments, such as websites, desktop computers, or mobile phones. Existing benchmarks for MLM agents in interactive environments are limited by their focus on a single environment, lack of detailed and generalized evaluation methods, and the complexities of constructing tasks and evaluators. To overcome these limitations, we introduce Crab, the first agent benchmark framework designed to support cross-environment tasks, incorporating a graph-based fine-grained evaluation method and an efficient mechanism for task and evaluator construction. Our framework supports multiple devices and can be easily extended to any environment with a Python interface. Leveraging Crab, we developed a cross-platform Crab Benchmark-v0 comprising 120 tasks in computer desktop and mobile phone environments. We evaluated four advanced MLMs using different single and multi-agent system configurations on this benchmark. The experimental results demonstrate that the single agent with GPT-4o achieves the best completion ratio of 38.01%. All framework code, agent code, and task datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/camel-ai/crab.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ExCyTIn-Bench: Evaluating LLM agents on Cyber Threat Investigation

    cs.CR 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    ExCyTIn-Bench is the first benchmark of 7542 questions from Microsoft Sentinel threat investigation graphs, where the best LLM agent achieves a reward of 0.606.

  2. AndroidDaily: A Verifiable Benchmark for Mobile GUI Agents on Real-World Closed-Source Applications

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    AndroidDaily supplies 350 verifiable tasks on 94 closed-source Android apps evaluated by GRADE (87.37% human agreement), with the strongest model achieving 62% success.

  3. ScaleWoB: Guiding GUI Agents with Coding Agents via Large-Scale Environmental Synthesis

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    ScaleWoB generates 100+ synthetic interactive GUI environments and 1000+ verifiable tasks as web pages, releasing a 120-task mobile benchmark where state-of-the-art agents achieve 27.92% success (17.82% on long-horizo...

  4. Memory in the Age of AI Agents

    cs.CL 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper maps agent memory research via three forms (token-level, parametric, latent), three functions (factual, experiential, working), and dynamics of formation/evolution/retrieval, plus benchmarks and future directions.

  5. Aguvis: Unified Pure Vision Agents for Autonomous GUI Interaction

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Aguvis presents a pure vision-based framework for autonomous GUI agents using structured reasoning via inner monologue, a new multimodal dataset, and two-stage training to reach SOTA on offline and online benchmarks.

  6. A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A comprehensive review of self-evolving AI agents that improve themselves over time, organized via a framework of inputs, agent system, environment, and optimizers, with domain-specific and safety discussions.

  7. Cybernaut: Towards Reliable Web Automation

    cs.SE 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A demonstration-to-SOP framework plus robust element identification and a trace similarity metric improves enterprise web automation success rates on an internal benchmark, with a fine-tuned consistency classifier rea...

Pith tools