Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LogEval: A Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Large Language Models In Log Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.01896 v1 pith:ECBE6AS7 submitted 2024-07-02 cs.CL cs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.IR
keywords analysisllmstasksbenchmarkcomprehensivedifferentevaluationlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Log analysis is crucial for ensuring the orderly and stable operation of information systems, particularly in the field of Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps). Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in natural language processing tasks. In the AIOps domain, they excel in tasks such as anomaly detection, root cause analysis of faults, operations and maintenance script generation, and alert information summarization. However, the performance of current LLMs in log analysis tasks remains inadequately validated. To address this gap, we introduce LogEval, a comprehensive benchmark suite designed to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in various log analysis tasks for the first time. This benchmark covers tasks such as log parsing, log anomaly detection, log fault diagnosis, and log summarization. LogEval evaluates each task using 4,000 publicly available log data entries and employs 15 different prompts for each task to ensure a thorough and fair assessment. By rigorously evaluating leading LLMs, we demonstrate the impact of various LLM technologies on log analysis performance, focusing on aspects such as self-consistency and few-shot contextual learning. We also discuss findings related to model quantification, Chinese-English question-answering evaluation, and prompt engineering. These findings provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of LLMs in multilingual environments and the effectiveness of different prompt strategies. Various evaluation methods are employed for different tasks to accurately measure the performance of LLMs in log analysis, ensuring a comprehensive assessment. The insights gained from LogEvals evaluation reveal the strengths and limitations of LLMs in log analysis tasks, providing valuable guidance for researchers and practitioners.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Language Models For Threat Detection in IoT Security Logs

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned open-source LLMs outperform classical ML classifiers on multiclass attack classification in the Edge-IIoTset dataset, while the mitigation-quality claims rest on a self-referential evaluation.

  2. A Survey of AIOps in the Era of Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A systematic survey that categorizes LLM-based AIOps research into four dimensions: data sources, tasks, methods, and evaluation, claiming to be the first comprehensive such overview.

Pith tools