Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CFinBench: A Comprehensive Chinese Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.02301 v1 pith:UBDO5SCJ submitted 2024-07-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords financialllmscfinbenchwhetherbenchmarkchineseevaluationmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on various NLP tasks, yet their potential in more challenging and domain-specific task, such as finance, has not been fully explored. In this paper, we present CFinBench: a meticulously crafted, the most comprehensive evaluation benchmark to date, for assessing the financial knowledge of LLMs under Chinese context. In practice, to better align with the career trajectory of Chinese financial practitioners, we build a systematic evaluation from 4 first-level categories: (1) Financial Subject: whether LLMs can memorize the necessary basic knowledge of financial subjects, such as economics, statistics and auditing. (2) Financial Qualification: whether LLMs can obtain the needed financial qualified certifications, such as certified public accountant, securities qualification and banking qualification. (3) Financial Practice: whether LLMs can fulfill the practical financial jobs, such as tax consultant, junior accountant and securities analyst. (4) Financial Law: whether LLMs can meet the requirement of financial laws and regulations, such as tax law, insurance law and economic law. CFinBench comprises 99,100 questions spanning 43 second-level categories with 3 question types: single-choice, multiple-choice and judgment. We conduct extensive experiments of 50 representative LLMs with various model size on CFinBench. The results show that GPT4 and some Chinese-oriented models lead the benchmark, with the highest average accuracy being 60.16%, highlighting the challenge presented by CFinBench. The dataset and evaluation code are available at https://cfinbench.github.io/.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FinSafetyBench: Evaluating LLM Safety in Real-World Financial Scenarios

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    FinSafetyBench shows that LLMs remain vulnerable to adversarial prompts that bypass financial compliance safeguards, with notably higher failure rates in Chinese-language scenarios.

  2. FinGAIA: A Chinese Benchmark for AI Agents in Real-World Financial Domain

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FinGAIA is a 407-task Chinese financial agent benchmark where the best agent, ChatGPT DeepResearch, scores 48.9%, far below financial experts at 84.7%.

  3. Language-Routed RAG and Direct Option Scoring for Multilingual Financial QA: DS@GT at FinMMEval

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For multilingual financial exam questions, no single model or reasoning strategy wins across languages: Qwen3-14B regresses 22.9 points on English, Llama-3.1-8B wins Greek, and chain-of-thought collapses Greek accurac...

Pith tools