REVIEW 1 cited by
Supporting Cross-language Cross-project Bug Localization Using Pre-trained Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Automatically locating a bug within a large codebase remains a significant challenge for developers. Existing techniques often struggle with generalizability and deployment due to their reliance on application-specific data and large model sizes. This paper proposes a novel pre-trained language model (PLM) based technique for bug localization that transcends project and language boundaries. Our approach leverages contrastive learning to enhance the representation of bug reports and source code. It then utilizes a novel ranking approach that combines commit messages and code segments. Additionally, we introduce a knowledge distillation technique that reduces model size for practical deployment without compromising performance. This paper presents several key benefits. By incorporating code segment and commit message analysis alongside traditional file-level examination, our technique achieves better bug localization accuracy. Furthermore, our model excels at generalizability - trained on code from various projects and languages, it can effectively identify bugs in unseen codebases. To address computational limitations, we propose a CPU-compatible solution. In essence, proposed work presents a highly effective, generalizable, and efficient bug localization technique with the potential to real-world deployment.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
When Deep Learning Meets Information Retrieval-based Bug Localization: A Survey
A systematic literature survey of 61 deep-learning-based IRBL studies that proposes taxonomies and a performance overview, concluding that DL mitigates lexical gap, code structure, and cold-start issues while LLM-base...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.