REVIEW 2 cited by
On Generalization for Generative Flow Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) have emerged as an innovative learning paradigm designed to address the challenge of sampling from an unnormalized probability distribution, called the reward function. This framework learns a policy on a constructed graph, which enables sampling from an approximation of the target probability distribution through successive steps of sampling from the learned policy. To achieve this, GFlowNets can be trained with various objectives, each of which can lead to the model s ultimate goal. The aspirational strength of GFlowNets lies in their potential to discern intricate patterns within the reward function and their capacity to generalize effectively to novel, unseen parts of the reward function. This paper attempts to formalize generalization in the context of GFlowNets, to link generalization with stability, and also to design experiments that assess the capacity of these models to uncover unseen parts of the reward function. The experiments will focus on length generalization meaning generalization to states that can be constructed only by longer trajectories than those seen in training.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Path-dependent Discrete Amortized Inference
Adding a learned path-dependent latent state to GFlowNet policies strictly increases their expressive power and improves convergence on discrete compositional sampling benchmarks.
-
Secrets of GFlowNets' Learning Behavior: A Theoretical Study
The paper derives bounds for GFlowNet convergence, sample complexity, implicit regularization, and robustness, but the proofs do not support the stated rates.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.