Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Novel Optimization Techniques for Parameter Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.04235 v1 pith:F22LSLXO submitted 2024-07-05 math.OC q-bio.QM

classification math.OCq-bio.QM
keywords crnasestimationparameterproblemsfeatureobjectiveoptimizationpoints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new optimization algorithm that is well suited for solving parameter estimation problems. We call our new method cubic regularized Newton with affine scaling (CRNAS). In contrast to so-called first-order methods which rely solely on the gradient of the objective function, our method utilizes the Hessian of the objective. As a result it is able to focus on points satisfying the second-order optimality conditions, as opposed to first-order methods that simply converge to critical points. This is an important feature in parameter estimation problems where the objective function is often non-convex and as a result there can be many critical points making it is near impossible to identify the global minimum. An important feature of parameter estimation in mathematical models of biological systems is that the parameters are constrained by either physical constraints or prior knowledge. We use an affine scaling approach to handle a wide class of constraints. We establish that CRNAS identifies a point satisfying $\epsilon$-approximate second-order optimality conditions within $O(\epsilon^{-3/2})$ iterations. Finally, we compare CRNAS with MATLAB's optimization solver fmincon on three different test problems. These test problems all feature mixtures of heterogeneous populations, a problem setting that CRNAS is particularly well-suited for. Our numerical simulations show CRNAS has favorable performance, performing comparable if not better than fmincon in accuracy and computational cost for most of our examples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Complexity Analysis of Convex Majorization Schemes for Nonconvex Constrained Optimization

    math.OC 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Convex majorization methods for nonconvex constrained problems achieve O(ε^{-(κ+1)/κ}) iteration complexity under Hölderian gradients, with a second-order variant reaching approximate second-order stationarity in O(1/...

Pith tools