Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Privacy or Transparency? Negotiated Smartphone Access as a Signifier of Trust in Romantic Relationships

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.04906 v1 pith:VAACQIZZ submitted 2024-07-06 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords accesstrustboundariesprivacyfindindividualsromanticsmartphone
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we analyze two large-scale surveys to examine how individuals think about sharing smartphone access with romantic partners as a function of trust in relationships. We find that the majority of couples have access to each others' devices, but may have explicit or implicit boundaries on how this access is to be used. Investigating these boundaries and related social norms, we find that there is little consensus about the level of smartphone access (i.e., transparency), or lack thereof (i.e., privacy) that is desirable in romantic contexts. However, there is broad agreement that the level of access should be mutual and consensual. Most individuals understand trust to be the basis of their decisions about transparency and privacy. Furthermore, we find individuals have crossed these boundaries, violating their partners' privacy and betraying their trust. We examine how, when, why, and by whom these betrayals occur. We consider the ramifications of these boundary violations in the case of intimate partner violence. Finally, we provide recommendations for design changes to enable technological enforcement of boundaries currently enforced by trust, bringing access control in line with users' sharing preferences.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Scalable Defenses against Intimate Partner Infiltrations

    cs.CR 2025-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    AID, a dual-branch ML system, reports 0.981 F1 and 1.6% false positive rate for detecting non-owner access and IPI-related behaviors in a 27-participant simulated study.

Pith tools