Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Data, Data Everywhere: A Guide for Pretraining Dataset Construction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.06380 v2 pith:CB5Y2YTM submitted 2024-07-08 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords pretrainingconstructiondataqualityacrossdevelopfirstinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The impressive capabilities of recent language models can be largely attributed to the multi-trillion token pretraining datasets that they are trained on. However, model developers fail to disclose their construction methodology which has lead to a lack of open information on how to develop effective pretraining sets. To address this issue, we perform the first systematic study across the entire pipeline of pretraining set construction. First, we run ablations on existing techniques for pretraining set development to identify which methods translate to the largest gains in model accuracy on downstream evaluations. Then, we categorize the most widely used data source, web crawl snapshots, across the attributes of toxicity, quality, type of speech, and domain. Finally, we show how such attribute information can be used to further refine and improve the quality of a pretraining set. These findings constitute an actionable set of steps that practitioners can use to develop high quality pretraining sets.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Using Scaling Laws for Data Source Utility Estimation in Domain-Specific Pre-Training

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Running multiple short annealing runs at different token scales can reveal per-source utility scaling curves that change data-source rankings compared with single point estimates.

Pith tools