Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Leptophilic ALPs with TWIST data for polarized muon decays

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.07987 v1 pith:EVHDOK2T submitted 2024-07-10 hep-ph hep-ex

classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords decaysmuonobtaintwistalpsconstraintscouplingdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We study the production of axion-like particles (ALPs) in association with electrons and neutrinos in the muon decay process. For this purpose, we compute the decay width of the muon to a four-body channel using a $d=7$ effective operator that couples the ALP to the Standard model fermions, namely leptons and neutrinos. Assuming a dominant coupling of the ALP to the dark sector, we only consider ALP decays to invisible final states. To obtain constraints on our model using the existing measurements, we leverage data from the TRIUMF Weak Interaction Symmetry Test (TWIST) experiment and obtain bounds on the ALP-lepton coupling for masses in the range of $0 < m_{\phi} < m_{\mu}/4$, as allowed by kinematics. Using the precision of current TWIST measurements, we obtain an order of magnitude estimation necessary for future searches to further constrain the parameter space for such a setup. Furthermore, we find that keeping realistic considerations, the new physics contribution can possibly be enhanced even with a minimalistic modification to the fiducial area used in the experiment potentially allowing for stringer constraints. At the end, in an attempt to relax the assumption that ALP decays to invisible only, we also investigate its stability and find potential longevity within collider environments for the mass range considered in this study.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools