REVIEW 1 cited by
LLMs' morphological analyses of complex FST-generated Finnish words
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Rule-based language processing systems have been overshadowed by neural systems in terms of utility, but it remains unclear whether neural NLP systems, in practice, learn the grammar rules that humans use. This work aims to shed light on the issue by evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs in a task of morphological analysis of complex Finnish noun forms. We generate the forms using an FST tool, and they are unlikely to have occurred in the training sets of the LLMs, therefore requiring morphological generalisation capacity. We find that GPT-4-turbo has some difficulties in the task while GPT-3.5-turbo struggles and smaller models Llama2-70B and Poro-34B fail nearly completely.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Investigating the (De)Composition Capabilities of Large Language Models in Natural-to-Formal Language Conversion
LLMs show measurable deficiencies in both decomposition and composition during natural-to-formal conversion, with decomposition errors dominating, under the new DEDC evaluation framework.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.