Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Self-Prompt Tuning: Enable Autonomous Role-Playing in LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.08995 v1 pith:BE5KLD3Z submitted 2024-07-12 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsself-prompttuneddatasetpromptsrole-playenablefine-tuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in LLMs have showcased their remarkable role-playing capabilities, able to accurately simulate the dialogue styles and cognitive processes of various roles based on different instructions and contexts. Studies indicate that assigning LLMs the roles of experts, a strategy known as role-play prompting, can enhance their performance in the corresponding domains. However, the prompt needs to be manually designed for the given problem, requiring certain expertise and iterative modifications. To this end, we propose self-prompt tuning, making LLMs themselves generate role-play prompts through fine-tuning. Leveraging the LIMA dataset as our foundational corpus, we employ GPT-4 to annotate role-play prompts for each data points, resulting in the creation of the LIMA-Role dataset. We then fine-tune LLMs like Llama-2-7B and Mistral-7B on LIMA-Role. Consequently, the self-prompt tuned LLMs can automatically generate expert role prompts for any given question. We extensively evaluate self-prompt tuned LLMs on widely used NLP benchmarks and open-ended question test. Our empirical results illustrate that self-prompt tuned LLMs outperform standard instruction tuned baselines across most datasets. This highlights the great potential of utilizing fine-tuning to enable LLMs to self-prompt, thereby automating complex prompting strategies. We release the dataset, models, and code at this \href{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Self-Prompt-Tuning-739E/}{url}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. REFLEX: Self-Refining Explainable Fact-Checking via Verdict-Anchored Style Control

    cs.CL 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    REFLEX improves explainable fact-checking by using verdict-anchored style control and self-disagreement signals to disentangle fact from style in LLM outputs, achieving SOTA results with minimal self-refined samples.

  2. AI-Facilitated Analysis of Abstracts and Conclusions: Flagging Unsubstantiated Claims and Ambiguous Pronouns

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Structured prompts can steer LLMs to flag certain unsupported claims and ambiguous pronouns, but performance varies sharply by model, context, and the syntactic role of the target, and the single test case was also th...

  3. Bridging the Gap: In-Context Learning for Modeling Human Disagreement

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Across four open-source LLMs and three subjective-task datasets, in-context learning with multi-perspective prompts improves aggregated-label predictions in zero-shot, but disaggregated hard and soft label predictions...

Pith tools