Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Anticipatory Task and Motion Planning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.13694 v1 pith:LOSQUNXV submitted 2024-07-18 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords planningtaskanticipatorycostenvironmentfuturemotiontamp
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider a sequential task and motion planning (tamp) setting in which a robot is assigned continuous-space rearrangement-style tasks one-at-a-time in an environment that persists between each. Lacking advance knowledge of future tasks, existing (myopic) planning strategies unwittingly introduce side effects that impede completion of subsequent tasks: e.g., by blocking future access or manipulation. We present anticipatory task and motion planning, in which estimates of expected future cost from a learned model inform selection of plans generated by a model-based tamp planner so as to avoid such side effects, choosing configurations of the environment that both complete the task and minimize overall cost. Simulated multi-task deployments in navigation-among-movable-obstacles and cabinet-loading domains yield improvements of 32.7% and 16.7% average per-task cost respectively. When given time in advance to prepare the environment, our learning-augmented planning approach yields improvements of 83.1% and 22.3%. Both showcase the value of our approach. Finally, we also demonstrate anticipatory tamp on a real-world Fetch mobile manipulator.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Failing Gracefully: Mitigating Impact of Inevitable Robot Failures

    cs.RO 2026-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A failure-impact safety metric and a MuJoCo benchmark are proposed, but validation data show large mismatches between predicted and observed failure impact for half the test trajectories.

Pith tools