Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Composer's Assistant 2: Interactive Multi-Track MIDI Infilling with Fine-Grained User Control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.14700 v1 pith:P62HB56U submitted 2024-07-19 cs.SD cs.LGeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.LGeess.AS
keywords controlssystemassistantcomposercontrolmusicfine-grainedinfilling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce Composer's Assistant 2, a system for interactive human-computer composition in the REAPER digital audio workstation. Our work upgrades the Composer's Assistant system (which performs multi-track infilling of symbolic music at the track-measure level) with a wide range of new controls to give users fine-grained control over the system's outputs. Controls introduced in this work include two types of rhythmic conditioning controls, horizontal and vertical note onset density controls, several types of pitch controls, and a rhythmic interest control. We train a T5-like transformer model to implement these controls and to serve as the backbone of our system. With these controls, we achieve a dramatic improvement in objective metrics over the original system. We also study how well our model understands the meaning of our controls, and we conduct a listening study that does not find a significant difference between real music and music composed in a co-creative fashion with our system. We release our complete system, consisting of source code, pretrained models, and REAPER scripts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Who Decides How Knowing Becomes Doing? Redistributing Authority in Human-AI Music Co-Creation

    cs.HC 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Editing an AI's reasoning steps instead of only typing prompts made 180 musicians report more contestability, agency, and protection of non-mainstream styles, though the survey evidence lacks statistical analysis.

Pith tools