REVIEW 3 cited by
Customized Retrieval Augmented Generation and Benchmarking for EDA Tool Documentation QA
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) enhances the accuracy and reliability of generative AI models by sourcing factual information from external databases, which is extensively employed in document-grounded question-answering (QA) tasks. Off-the-shelf RAG flows are well pretrained on general-purpose documents, yet they encounter significant challenges when being applied to knowledge-intensive vertical domains, such as electronic design automation (EDA). This paper addresses such issue by proposing a customized RAG framework along with three domain-specific techniques for EDA tool documentation QA, including a contrastive learning scheme for text embedding model fine-tuning, a reranker distilled from proprietary LLM, and a generative LLM fine-tuned with high-quality domain corpus. Furthermore, we have developed and released a documentation QA evaluation benchmark, ORD-QA, for OpenROAD, an advanced RTL-to-GDSII design platform. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed RAG flow and techniques have achieved superior performance on ORD-QA as well as on a commercial tool, compared with state-of-the-arts. The ORD-QA benchmark and the training dataset for our customized RAG flow are open-source at https://github.com/lesliepy99/RAG-EDA.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
EDATracer: An Agentic Framework for Large-Scale EDA Artifact Analysis
EDATracer is a knowledge-graph-backed AI agent framework for answering questions about chip design artifacts, claiming better accuracy and up to 3.2x lower token cost than Cursor and Claude Code on a new 90-question b...
-
MMCircuitEval: A Comprehensive Multimodal Circuit-Focused Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs
A new multimodal benchmark of 3,614 circuit QA pairs shows that large language models perform worst on back-end layout and computation tasks, and that current models generally underperform on circuit design questions.
-
A Survey of Research in Large Language Models for Electronic Design Automation
A survey of LLM applications in electronic design automation, organized by design stage and adaptation technique.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.