pith. sign in

arxiv: 2407.16316 · v2 · submitted 2024-07-23 · ✦ hep-ph

Discovering an Unquenched Dynamics Mechanism for Charmonium Scattering

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 23:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords charmonium scatteringunquenched mechanismvirtual charmed mesonsone-boson exchangedi-J/ψ spectrumfully heavy hadronsCMSLHCb
0
0 comments X

The pith

An unquenched mechanism with virtual charmed mesons formed from vacuum quarks reproduces the di-J/ψ invariant mass spectrum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes an unquenched mechanism for charmonium scattering based on the internal structure of charmonium. Charm quarks capture light quarks from the vacuum to create virtual charmed mesons that mediate an effective one-boson exchange. This process accurately matches the di-J/ψ invariant mass spectrum measured by CMS and LHCb. A reader would care if this holds because it offers a unified way to describe scattering of fully heavy hadrons using a simple dynamical picture.

Core claim

The unquenched mechanism utilizes the internal structure of charmonium by capturing light flavor quarks and anti-quarks from the vacuum, allowing charm and anti-charm quarks to form virtual charmed mesons that mediate an effective one-boson exchange process. This mechanism accurately reproduces the di-J/ψ invariant mass spectrum observed by CMS and LHCb.

What carries the argument

The unquenched mechanism that forms virtual charmed mesons by capturing light quarks from the vacuum to mediate one-boson exchange in charmonium scattering.

If this is right

  • It offers a comprehensive framework for understanding charmonium scattering.
  • It is applicable to scattering problems involving all fully heavy hadrons.
  • The mechanism demonstrates validity through reproduction of experimental spectra without additional terms.
  • It highlights the role of unquenched dynamics in heavy hadron interactions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If valid, similar vacuum quark capture effects may appear in bottomonium or other heavy quark systems.
  • The approach could influence how lattice QCD calculations incorporate unquenched effects for heavy hadrons.
  • Future collider data on other fully heavy hadron pairs could test predictions from this mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The effective one-boson exchange mediated by virtual charmed mesons formed from vacuum light quarks provides the dominant contribution to the scattering amplitude.

What would settle it

An observation that the di-J/ψ invariant mass spectrum cannot be reproduced by this mechanism alone and requires significant additional background or fitted parameters to match the data shape.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2407.16316 by Jun He, Qi Huang, Rui Chen, Xiang Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: A novel approach enabling one-boson exchange for e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The scattering mechanisms of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The fit results on experimental data are presented, with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we propose an unquenched mechanism for charmonium scattering that utilizes the internal structure of charmonium. By capturing light flavor quarks and anti-quarks from the vacuum, charm and anti-charm quarks form virtual charmed mesons, which mediate an effective one-boson exchange process. This approach accurately reproduces the di-$J/\psi$ invariant mass spectrum observed by CMS and LHCb, demonstrating its validity. Our mechanism offers a comprehensive framework for understanding charmonium scattering and is applicable to the scattering problems involving all fully heavy hadrons, an area of increasing interest.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an unquenched mechanism for charmonium scattering in which charm and anti-charm quarks capture light quarks from the vacuum to form virtual charmed mesons that mediate an effective one-boson exchange interaction. It asserts that this mechanism accurately reproduces the di-J/ψ invariant mass spectrum measured by CMS and LHCb and offers a framework applicable to scattering of all fully heavy hadrons.

Significance. If the central claim holds and the reproduction is shown to be a genuine prediction rather than a fit, the work would supply a new dynamical picture for charmonium interactions that could be extended to other fully heavy systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the mechanism 'accurately reproduces' the di-J/ψ spectrum is unsupported by any derivation of the scattering amplitude, values of the effective couplings or cutoffs, or quantitative comparison to data; without these elements it is impossible to determine whether the agreement is predictive or post-hoc.
  2. [Main text] Main text: no power-counting argument or numerical estimate is supplied to demonstrate that the virtual charmed-meson one-boson exchange dominates over other unquenched contributions (direct four-quark contact terms, light-meson exchange, or multi-meson intermediate states) in the 6–7 GeV region; the observed lineshape could therefore arise from the propagator form rather than from the proposed mechanism being leading.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive criticism of our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below. Where the concerns identify missing elements, we will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the mechanism 'accurately reproduces' the di-J/ψ spectrum is unsupported by any derivation of the scattering amplitude, values of the effective couplings or cutoffs, or quantitative comparison to data; without these elements it is impossible to determine whether the agreement is predictive or post-hoc.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract phrasing is too assertive given the supporting material provided. The manuscript derives the effective one-boson-exchange amplitude from the virtual charmed-meson intermediate states and overlays the resulting lineshape on the CMS and LHCb di-J/ψ data. However, explicit numerical values for the couplings and cutoffs, together with a quantitative measure of agreement, are not tabulated. In the revision we will (i) tone down the abstract, (ii) add a table or paragraph listing the parameter values, and (iii) include a quantitative comparison (e.g., residuals or a goodness-of-fit metric) so that readers can judge the predictive versus post-hoc character of the result. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Main text] Main text: no power-counting argument or numerical estimate is supplied to demonstrate that the virtual charmed-meson one-boson exchange dominates over other unquenched contributions (direct four-quark contact terms, light-meson exchange, or multi-meson intermediate states) in the 6–7 GeV region; the observed lineshape could therefore arise from the propagator form rather than from the proposed mechanism being leading.

    Authors: This observation is correct: the present text does not supply a power-counting argument or numerical suppression estimates for competing unquenched diagrams in the 6–7 GeV window. We will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) that estimates the relative size of the one-boson-exchange term versus contact interactions and multi-meson states, using naive dimensional analysis and the expected suppression factors from the quark-model wave functions. This addition will make explicit the assumption that the virtual-meson exchange provides the leading contribution and will note the kinematic regime in which this is expected to hold. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity identified from provided excerpts

full rationale

The abstract and context describe a proposed unquenched mechanism whose validity is asserted via reproduction of the di-J/ψ spectrum, but no equations, parameter-fitting procedure, or self-citation chain is quoted that would reduce the central claim to a tautology or fitted input by construction. Without explicit text showing, for example, that couplings are adjusted solely to the target spectrum and then presented as an independent prediction, or that a uniqueness result is imported from the same authors' prior work, the derivation cannot be classified as circular under the stated criteria. The paper is therefore treated as self-contained against external benchmarks on the basis of the material supplied.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that virtual charmed mesons formed by vacuum light-quark capture dominate the scattering; this introduces at least one new dynamical entity and likely several effective couplings whose values are not fixed by prior literature.

free parameters (1)
  • effective couplings or cutoffs in the one-boson exchange
    Required to match the observed di-J/ψ spectrum shape; their values are not stated to be taken from independent data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Effective one-boson exchange via virtual charmed mesons is the dominant process in charmonium scattering
    Invoked to justify the reduction of the full QCD dynamics to the proposed mechanism.
invented entities (1)
  • virtual charmed mesons formed by capturing light quarks from the vacuum no independent evidence
    purpose: To mediate the effective one-boson exchange between charmonium states
    New dynamical intermediaries introduced to implement the unquenched mechanism; no independent experimental signature outside the fitted spectrum is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5617 in / 1626 out tokens · 20527 ms · 2026-05-23T23:02:22.692588+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    By capturing light flavor quarks and anti-quarks from the vacuum, charm and anti-charm quarks form virtual charmed mesons, which mediate an effective one-boson exchange process... reproduces the di-J/ψ invariant mass spectrum

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Additionally, the higher threshold for producing charmed-strange meson pairs leads to further suppression by the loop function

    Consequently, contributions from charmed-strange mesons are at least 2 /3 smaller. Additionally, the higher threshold for producing charmed-strange meson pairs leads to further suppression by the loop function. Therefore, to fo- cus on the primary physics, we exclude contributions from charmed-strange meson loops. Furthermore, Fig. 2 illustrates that the ...

  2. [2]

    Yukawa, On the Interaction of Elementary Particles I, Proc

    H. Yukawa, On the Interaction of Elementary Particles I, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jap. 17, 48-57 (1935)

  3. [3]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Observation of J/ψp Resonances Con- sistent with Pentaquark States in Λ0 b → J/ψK− p Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015)

  4. [4]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019)

  5. [5]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Phys. 18, 751-754 (2022)

  6. [6]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Study of the doubly charmed tetraquark T + cc, Nature Commun. 13, 3351 (2022)

  7. [7]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, The hidden- charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept. 639, 1-121 (2016)

  8. [8]

    J. M. Richard, Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives, Few Body Syst. 57, no.12, 1185-1212 (2016)

  9. [9]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y . R. Liu and S. L. Zhu, A review of the open charm and open bottom systems, Rept. Prog. Phys. 80, no.7, 076201 (2017)

  10. [10]

    R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell and E. S. Swanson, Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143-194 (2017)

  11. [11]

    Esposito, A

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni and A. D. Polosa, Multiquark Reso- nances, Phys. Rept. 668, 1-97 (2017)

  12. [12]

    F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao and B. S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) no.1, 015004 [erratum: Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (2022) no.2, 029901]

  13. [13]

    A. Ali, J. S. Lange and S. Stone, Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 123-198 (2017)

  14. [14]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C. P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo and C. Z. Yuan, The XYZ states: ex- perimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rept. 873, 1-154 (2020)

  15. [15]

    Y . R. Liu, H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Pen- taquark and Tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.107, 237- 320 (2019)

  16. [16]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y . R. Liu and S. L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys. 86, no.2, 026201 (2023)

  17. [17]

    Hayrapetyan et al

    A. Hayrapetyan et al. [CMS], New Structures in the J/ψJ/ψ Mass Spectrum in Proton-Proton Collisions at √s=13 TeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 111901 (2024)

  18. [18]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Observation of structure in the J/ψ-pair mass spectrum, Sci. Bull. 65, 1983-1993 (2020)

  19. [19]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], Observation of an Excess of Dichar- monium Events in the Four-Muon Final State with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151902 (2023)

  20. [20]

    M. S. liu, F. X. Liu, X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, Fully heavy tetraquark states and their evidences in LHC observations, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076017 (2024)

  21. [21]

    Tiwari, D

    R. Tiwari, D. P. Rathaud and A. K. Rai, Spectroscopy of all charm tetraquark states, Indian J. Phys. 97, 943-954 (2023)

  22. [22]

    Q. F. L ¨u, D. Y . Chen and Y . B. Dong, Masses of fully heavy tetraquarks QQ ¯Q ¯Q in an extended relativized quark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 871 (2020)

  23. [23]

    R. N. Faustov, V . O. Galkin and E. M. Savchenko, Masses of the QQ ¯Q ¯Q tetraquarks in the relativistic diquark–antidiquark picture, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114030 (2020)

  24. [24]

    J. R. Zhang, 0 + fully-charmed tetraquark states, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014018 (2021)

  25. [25]

    Q. Li, C. H. Chang, G. L. Wang and T. Wang, Mass spectra and wave functions ofTQQ ¯Q ¯Q tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D104, 014018 (2021)

  26. [26]

    F. X. Liu, M. S. Liu, X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, Higher mass spectra of the fully-charmed and fully-bottom tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 104, 116029 (2021)

  27. [27]

    J. F. Giron and R. F. Lebed, Simple spectrum of c¯cc¯c states in the dynamical diquark model, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074003 (2020)

  28. [28]

    Karliner and J

    M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Interpretation of structure in the di- J/ψ spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114039 (2020)

  29. [29]

    Z. G. Wang, Tetraquark candidates in the LHCb’s di-J/ψ mass spectrum, Chin. Phys. C 44, 113106 (2020)

  30. [30]

    H. W. Ke, X. Han, X. H. Liu and Y . L. Shi, Tetraquark state X(6900) and the interaction between diquark and antidiquark, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 427 (2021)

  31. [31]

    Zhu, Fully-heavy tetraquark spectra and production at hadron colliders, Nucl

    R. Zhu, Fully-heavy tetraquark spectra and production at hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B 966, 115393 (2021)

  32. [32]

    X. Jin, Y . Xue, H. Huang and J. Ping, Full-heavy tetraquarks in constituent quark models, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1083 (2020)

  33. [33]

    G. Yang, J. Ping and J. Segovia, Exotic resonances of fully- heavy tetraquarks in a lattice-QCD insipired quark model, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014006 (2021)

  34. [34]

    R. M. Albuquerque, S. Narison, A. Rabemananjara, D. Ra- betiarivony and G. Randriamanatrika, Doubly-hidden scalar heavy molecules and tetraquarks states from QCD at NLO, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094001 (2020)

  35. [35]

    R. M. Albuquerque, S. Narison, D. Rabetiarivony and G. Ran- driamanatrika, Doubly hidden 0 ++ molecules and tetraquarks states from QCD at NLO, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc.312-317, 120- 124 (2021)

  36. [36]

    R. H. Wu, Y . S. Zuo, C. Y . Wang, C. Meng, Y . Q. Ma and K. T. Chao, NLO results with operator mixing for fully heavy tetraquarks in QCD sum rules, JHEP 11, 023 (2022)

  37. [37]

    Asadi and G

    Z. Asadi and G. R. Boroun, Masses of fully heavy tetraquark states from a four-quark static potential model, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014006 (2022)

  38. [38]

    B. C. Yang, L. Tang and C. F. Qiao, Scalar fully-heavy tetraquark states QQ′ ¯Q ¯Q′ in QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 324 (2021)

  39. [39]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Strong decays of fully-charm tetraquarks into di-charmonia, Sci. Bull. 65, 1994- 2000 (2020)

  40. [40]

    C. Deng, H. Chen and J. Ping, Towards the understanding of fully-heavy tetraquark states from various models, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014001 (2021)

  41. [41]

    M. C. Gordillo, F. De Soto and J. Segovia, Di ffusion Monte Carlo calculations of fully-heavy multiquark bound states, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114007 (2020)

  42. [42]

    Z. Zhao, K. Xu, A. Kaewsnod, X. Liu, A. Limphirat and Y . Yan, Study of charmoniumlike and fully-charm tetraquark spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D103, 116027 (2021)

  43. [43]

    R. N. Faustov, V . O. Galkin and E. M. Savchenko, Heavy tetraquarks in the relativistic quark model, Universe 7, 94 (2021)

  44. [44]

    G. J. Wang, L. Meng, M. Oka and S. L. Zhu, Higher fully charmed tetraquarks: Radial excitations and P-wave states, Phys. Rev. D 104, 036016 (2021)

  45. [45]

    J. Z. Wang, D. Y . Chen, X. Liu and T. Matsuki, Producing fully charm structures in theJ/ψ -pair invariant mass spectrum, Phys. 6 Rev. D 103, 071503 (2021)

  46. [46]

    J. Z. Wang, X. Liu and T. Matsuki, Fully-heavy structures in the invariant mass spectrum of J/ψψ(3686), J/ψψ(3770), ψ(3686)ψ(3686), and J/ψΥ(1S ) at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 816, 136209 (2021)

  47. [47]

    J. Z. Wang and X. Liu, Improved understanding of the peaking phenomenon existing in the new di-J/ψ invariant mass spectrum from the CMS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D106, 054015 (2022)

  48. [48]

    C. Gong, M. C. Du, Q. Zhao, X. H. Zhong and B. Zhou, Nature of X(6900) and its production mechanism at LHCb, Phys. Lett. B 824, 136794 (2022)

  49. [49]

    X. K. Dong, V . Baru, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev and B. S. Zou, Is the existence of a J/ψJ/ψ bound state plausible?, Sci. Bull. 66, 2462-2470 (2021)

  50. [50]

    X. K. Dong, V . Baru, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart and A. Nefediev, Coupled-Channel Interpretation of the LHCb Double- J/ψ Spectrum and Hints of a New State Near the J/ψJ/ψ Threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 132001 (2021), [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 119901 (2021)]

  51. [51]

    Z. R. Liang, X. Y . Wu and D. L. Yao, Hunting for states in the recent LHCb di-J/ψ invariant mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D104, 034034 (2021)

  52. [52]

    Z. H. Guo and J. A. Oller, Insights into the inner structures of the fully charmed tetraquark state X(6900), Phys. Rev. D 103, 034024 (2021)

  53. [53]

    Zhuang, Y

    Z. Zhuang, Y . Zhang, Y . Ma and Q. Wang, Lineshape of the compact fully heavy tetraquark, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054026 (2022)

  54. [54]

    Y . Lu, C. Chen, G. Y . Qin and H. Q. Zheng, A discussion on the anomalous threshold enhancement of J/ψ → ψ(3770) cou- plings and X(6900) peak, Chin. Phys. C 48, 041001 (2024)

  55. [55]

    Y . Lyu, H. Tong, T. Sugiura, S. Aoki, T. Doi, T. Hatsuda, J. Meng and T. Miyamoto, Dibaryon with Highest Charm Num- ber near Unitarity from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 072003 (2021)

  56. [56]

    Mathur, M

    N. Mathur, M. Padmanath and D. Chakraborty, Strongly Bound Dibaryon with Maximal Beauty Flavor from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 111901 (2023)

  57. [57]

    H. Y . Cheng, C. Y . Cheung, G. L. Lin, Y . C. Lin, T. M. Yan and H. L. Yu, Chiral Lagrangians for radiative decays of heavy hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1030-1042 (1993)

  58. [58]

    T. M. Yan, H. Y . Cheng, C. Y . Cheung, G. L. Lin, Y . C. Lin and H. L. Yu, Heavy quark symmetry and chiral dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1148-1164 (1992), [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 55, 5851 (1997)]

  59. [59]

    M. B. Wise, Chiral perturbation theory for hadrons containing a heavy quark, Phys. Rev. D 45, R2188 (1992)

  60. [60]

    Burdman and J

    G. Burdman and J. F. Donoghue, Union of chiral and heavy quark symmetries, Phys. Lett. B 280, 287-291 (1992)

  61. [61]

    Casalbuoni, A

    R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, N. Di Bartolomeo, R. Gatto, F. Feruglio and G. Nardulli, Phenomenology of heavy meson chiral Lagrangians, Phys. Rept. 281, 145-238 (1997)

  62. [62]

    Z. M. Ding, H. Y . Jiang, D. Song and J. He, Hidden and doubly heavy molecular states from interactions D(∗) (s) ¯D(∗) s /B(∗) (s) ¯B(∗) s and D(∗) (s) D(∗) s /B(∗) (s) B(∗) s , Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 732 (2021)

  63. [63]

    A. F. Falk and M. E. Luke, Strong decays of excited heavy mesons in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Lett. B 292, 119- 127 (1992)

  64. [64]

    Isola, M

    C. Isola, M. Ladisa, G. Nardulli and P. Santorelli, Charming penguins in B → K∗π, K(ρ, ω, ϕ) decays, Phys. Rev. D 68, 114001 (2003)

  65. [65]

    X. Liu, Z. G. Luo, Y . R. Liu and S. L. Zhu, X(3872) and Other Possible Heavy Molecular States, Eur. Phys. J. C 61, 411-428 (2009)

  66. [66]

    R. Chen, Z. F. Sun, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Strong LHCb evi- dence supporting the existence of the hidden-charm molecular pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 100, 011502 (2019)

  67. [67]

    X. K. Dong, X. H. Mo, P. Wang and C. Z. Yuan, Hadronic cross section of e+e− annihilation at bottomonium energy re- gion, Chin. Phys. C 44, 083001 (2020)