Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.18961 v3 pith:BQYWADLA submitted 2024-07-18 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords mmaucapabilitiesagentscomprehensivelimitationsmodelstasksacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have increased the demand for comprehensive benchmarks to evaluate their capabilities as human-like agents. Existing benchmarks, while useful, often focus on specific application scenarios, emphasizing task completion but failing to dissect the underlying skills that drive these outcomes. This lack of granularity makes it difficult to deeply discern where failures stem from. Additionally, setting up these environments requires considerable effort, and issues of unreliability and reproducibility sometimes arise, especially in interactive tasks. To address these limitations, we introduce the Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark, featuring comprehensive offline tasks that eliminate the need for complex environment setups. It evaluates models across five domains, including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics, and covers five essential capabilities: Understanding, Reasoning, Planning, Problem-solving, and Self-correction. With a total of 20 meticulously designed tasks encompassing over 3K distinct prompts, MMAU provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the strengths and limitations of LLM agents. By testing 18 representative models on MMAU, we provide deep and insightful analyses. Ultimately, MMAU not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of LLM agents but also enhances the interpretability of their performance. Datasets and evaluation scripts of MMAU are released at https://github.com/apple/axlearn/tree/main/docs/research/mmau.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Preference-ASR: A Preference-Aware Test Set for Benchmarking ASR in the Era of Speech LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    PreferenceASR is a preference-aware ASR test set built from seven corpora that shows model rankings change when user output-style instructions are considered.

  2. DrafterBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Tasks Automation in Civil Engineering

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DrafterBench is a new benchmark of 1,920 PDF drawing-revision tasks; on it, the best model (OpenAI o1) averages about 80/100, and all tested models fail hard on incomplete instructions and plan execution.

  3. AgentsNet: Coordination and Collaborative Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs

    cs.MA 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A benchmark built from five distributed computing problems shows that frontier LLM agent networks solve small coordination tasks but break down as the network scales to 100 agents.

  4. Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges

    cs.CL 2025-03 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that deconstructs LLM agent systems via a methodology-centered taxonomy linking design principles to emergent behaviors, applications, and challenges.

Pith tools