pith. sign in

arxiv: 2407.19801 · v5 · submitted 2024-07-29 · 🪐 quant-ph

Elastic scattering of twisted electrons by CO₂ molecules at high energies

Raul Sheldon Pinto , Rakesh Choubisa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 23:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords elastic scatteringtwisted electronsBessel beamsCO2 moleculesfirst Born approximationscattering cross sectionsorientation averagingpolyatomic molecules
0
0 comments X

The pith

Twisted electron beams produce scattering cross sections from CO2 that differ from plane waves after orientation and impact averaging.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates elastic scattering cross sections for high-energy twisted Bessel electron beams incident on CO2 molecules. It optimizes the molecular geometry with coupled cluster and density functional methods, then models the interaction via static Coulomb potentials and computes the differential and total cross sections in the first Born approximation. All results are averaged over molecular orientations with a passive rotational technique and over impact parameters to represent a distribution of molecules, with beam twists ranging from topological charge 1 to 20. A sympathetic reader would care because the work directly compares these twisted-beam results to ordinary plane-wave scattering and presents the procedure as usable for any polyatomic molecule. The central object carrying the argument is the averaged cross section obtained from the Born treatment of the twisted wave.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the differential and total scattering cross-sections for twisted electron beams with topological charges m_l = 1 to 20 can be obtained in the first Born approximation for an orientation-averaged CO2 molecule described by static Coulomb potentials, with additional averaging over impact parameters, and that the resulting total cross-section differs from the plane-wave case; the same procedure applies to any polyatomic molecule regardless of structure.

What carries the argument

The first Born approximation applied to the static Coulomb potential of the orientation-averaged molecule, followed by passive rotational averaging and impact-parameter averaging.

If this is right

  • The total cross section for plane waves can be compared directly to that for twisted beams with any chosen topological charge.
  • The scattering depends on the beam twist parameter m_l, producing distinct results for charges between 1 and 20.
  • The same computational steps yield cross sections for any chosen polyatomic molecule once its geometry is fixed.
  • Orientation averaging and impact-parameter averaging together give cross sections representative of an ensemble of randomly placed molecules.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported differences between plane-wave and twisted-beam cross sections could be tested by comparing calculated angular distributions to measured ones at fixed high energy.
  • The averaging methods might extend to scattering of other structured waves, such as optical beams or atomic beams, on the same molecules.
  • If the twist dependence proves measurable, it could allow experiments to extract information about molecular size or alignment using controlled beam topology.

Load-bearing premise

The static approximation with Coulomb potentials combined with the first Born approximation remains valid for high-energy twisted-beam scattering from CO2.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of the total or differential cross section for twisted-electron scattering from CO2 at high energies that deviates substantially from the computed values would falsify the applicability of the reported cross sections.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2407.19801 by Rakesh Choubisa, Raul Sheldon Pinto.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Spatial structure and intensity profile of the Bessel beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: illustrates the incidence of a Bessel beam on a CO2 molecule with an impact parameter b. 𝜙𝑝 is measured on the x’-y’ plane from the x’ axis. The primed axes are those of the beam, and the unprimed ones are those of the molecule. B. Target Molecules An effective electron molecular scattering calculation re￾quires that we have, a priori, an accurate molecular ground state. Since molecules are polyatomic, the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Elastic DCS for plane wave electron impact as a function of scattered electron angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Elastic differential cross-section of CO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Differential cross section of Bessel beam impact on CO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Differential cross section of macroscopic target of CO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Total Elastic Cross-Section as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Elastic scattering of a twisted (Bessel) electron beam by CO$_2$ molecules is studied theoretically at high energies. The molecule's structure is optimized using coupled cluster theory and density functional theory with correlation-consistent and Pople basis sets. Coulomb potentials are used in the static approximation. The differential and total scattering cross-sections are computed in the first Born approximation. All cross-sections are orientation-averaged using a passive rotational averaging technique. The scattering is studied by the impact of the twisted beam with topological charges in the range $m_l$ = 1 and $m_l$ = 20. The cross sections are, in addition, averaged over the target's impact parameters, which accounts for the cross sections of a large distribution of CO$_2$ molecules. Finally, the molecule's total cross-section by plane waves and twisted beams is reported. The proposed methodology can be applied to study any polyatomic molecule, regardless of its structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes elastic differential and total scattering cross sections for high-energy twisted (Bessel) electron beams incident on CO2 molecules. Molecular geometry is optimized via coupled-cluster and DFT methods; static Coulomb potentials are used; cross sections are obtained in the first Born approximation; results are passively rotationally averaged and further averaged over impact parameters for topological charges |m_l| = 1 to 20; plane-wave results are reported for comparison. The methodology is presented as applicable to arbitrary polyatomic molecules.

Significance. If the central approximations remain valid, the work supplies concrete numerical cross sections illustrating the influence of beam orbital angular momentum on electron-molecule scattering and supplies a reusable computational pipeline for other targets. The explicit treatment of impact-parameter averaging for an extended molecular distribution is a concrete technical contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [scattering theory / first Born implementation] The section describing the scattering calculation applies the first Born approximation directly to the Fourier transform of the static sum of Coulomb potentials for a Bessel beam without any error bound, comparison to second-Born or distorted-wave results, or test of sensitivity to the conical transverse-momentum distribution. Because the validity of the truncation is load-bearing for all reported cross sections, this omission must be addressed.
  2. [results / total cross sections] The results section presents orientation- and impact-parameter-averaged total cross sections for |m_l| up to 20 but contains no quantitative assessment of how the double averaging propagates uncertainties from the underlying potential model (CC vs. DFT geometries) or from the static approximation itself.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states the range as “m_l = 1 and m_l = 20”; the text should clarify whether all integer values between 1 and 20 are computed or only the endpoints.
  2. [methods / averaging procedures] Explicit equations for the passive rotational averaging and the impact-parameter integration kernel would improve reproducibility; the current description is procedural rather than formulaic.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The section describing the scattering calculation applies the first Born approximation directly to the Fourier transform of the static sum of Coulomb potentials for a Bessel beam without any error bound, comparison to second-Born or distorted-wave results, or test of sensitivity to the conical transverse-momentum distribution. Because the validity of the truncation is load-bearing for all reported cross sections, this omission must be addressed.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the first Born approximation (FBA) strengthens the work. At the high energies studied, the FBA is standard for elastic scattering because the interaction is perturbative. In the revised manuscript we will expand the scattering theory section with a discussion of the FBA validity range for high-energy electron-molecule collisions, supported by literature citations. We will also add a short analysis of sensitivity to the conical angle by examining its influence within the existing impact-parameter averaging. A quantitative comparison against second-Born or distorted-wave results lies outside the present scope, as it would require a major extension of the computational framework; this limitation will be noted explicitly as future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The results section presents orientation- and impact-parameter-averaged total cross sections for |m_l| up to 20 but contains no quantitative assessment of how the double averaging propagates uncertainties from the underlying potential model (CC vs. DFT geometries) or from the static approximation itself.

    Authors: The manuscript optimizes geometries with both coupled-cluster and DFT methods but does not quantify the resulting differences in cross sections. In the revision we will add a direct comparison of the orientation- and impact-parameter-averaged total cross sections obtained from the two geometry sets, thereby providing a quantitative measure of sensitivity to the potential model. We will also include a concise discussion of the static approximation and its expected accuracy at the energies considered. These additions will be placed in the results section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard Born + static potential computation with independent inputs

full rationale

The derivation applies the first Born approximation to the Fourier transform of a static sum of Coulomb potentials whose geometry is obtained from external CC/DFT calculations. All averaging steps (rotational, impact-parameter) are post-processing of this standard scattering integral. No quantity is defined in terms of another computed result, no parameter is fitted to a data subset and then relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing premise rests on a self-citation chain. The plane-wave versus twisted-beam comparison uses the identical external potential model, so the reported difference is a direct consequence of the beam wavefunction, not a tautology. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions from quantum scattering theory and quantum chemistry; no new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The first Born approximation is valid at high energies for the scattering process.
    Invoked explicitly for computing the cross-sections.
  • domain assumption The static approximation with Coulomb potentials adequately describes the electron-molecule interaction.
    Used to model the potentials in the calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5686 in / 1427 out tokens · 30028 ms · 2026-05-23T23:11:30.309031+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hence, we represent the initial and final plane wave states by|𝑖⟩

    Plane-wave scattering amplitude On simplifying Equation (19) using Bethe’s integral given in [34, 35], we obtain the plane wave scattering amplitude as: 𝑇 𝑝𝑤 𝑖𝑖 (𝚫) = − 2 Δ2 (𝛼 − 𝜒) (21) Since we consider elastic scattering there is no change in the initial state of the molecule due to scattering. Hence, we represent the initial and final plane wave state...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Also,𝑇 𝑝𝑤 𝑖𝑖 in the integrand is a function of𝚫𝒕𝒘

    Bessel scattering amplitude The Bessel transition amplitude/scattering amplitude given as functions of the plane wave transition amplitude/scattering amplitudecanbededucedfromEquations(12),(13),(18),and (19) to be: 𝑇 𝑡 𝑤 𝑓 𝑖 (𝜘, 𝚫𝒕𝒘 ) = ∫ 𝑑2ki⊥ (2𝜋)2 𝑎𝜘𝑚𝑙 ki⊥ 𝑇 𝑝𝑤 𝑖𝑖 (𝚫𝒕𝒘 ) (29) Note that the notation𝑇 𝑡 𝑤 𝑓 𝑖 is used for the twisted scattering amplitude ...

    work page 1984

  3. [3]

    The DCS is calculated at the impact parameterb = 0

    Differential Cross Section for𝑚𝑙 values atb = 0 The DCSs plotted here are for the topological charges𝑚𝑙 = 1, 2, 3, 7, 12, and 20 of the twisted beam. The DCS is calculated at the impact parameterb = 0. This scenario (or any b ≠ 0) is difficult to realize experimentally; however, we consider this case as it gives a general understanding of the twisted elec...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The peak also narrows slightly as the energy is increased from 500 eV to 1.5 keV

    There is a reduction in peak amplitude as E𝑖 isincreasedfrom500eVto1.5keV,sincetheDCSisinversely proportional to the fourth power of the momentum transfer, which depends on the incident energy. The peak also narrows slightly as the energy is increased from 500 eV to 1.5 keV. Qualitatively, it is understood as: As the energy increases,𝜘 present in the argu...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Differential cross sections averaging overb Here, we present the results of impact parameter averaged DCS ((DCS)𝑎𝑣). Figure 6 illustrates 3 subplots of (DCS)𝑎𝑣 plottedagainstthescatteringangle 𝜃𝑠 atincidentenergiesE 𝑖 = 500eV,1keV,and1.5keV.Theopeninganglesconsideredfor theBesselbeamare 𝜃 𝑝=6 ◦,20 ◦ and45 ◦. Theyarerepresented bybrokencurvesinmagenta,ligh...

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    L. Zou, P. Zhang, A. J. Silenko, and L. Lu, Recent progress in the physics of twisted particles, The Innovation4 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Molina-Terriza, J

    G. Molina-Terriza, J. P. Torres, and L. Torner, Twisted photons, Nature physics3, 305 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Grillo, G.C

    V. Grillo, G.C. Gazzadi, E.Mafakheri, S. Frabboni, E.Karimi, andR.W.Boyd,Holographicgenerationofhighlytwistedelec- tron beams, Physical review letters114, 034801 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Afanasev, D

    A. Afanasev, D. Karlovets, and V. Serbo, Elastic scattering of twisted neutrons by nuclei, Physical Review C103, 054612 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Maxwell, G

    A. Maxwell, G. Armstrong, M. Ciappina, E. Pisanty, Y. Kang, A. Brown, M. Lewenstein, and C. F. de Morisson Faria, Ma- nipulating twisted electrons in strong-field ionization, Faraday Discussions228, 394 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Grillo, J

    V. Grillo, J. Harris, G. C. Gazzadi, R. Balboni, E. Mafakheri, M. R. Dennis, S. Frabboni, R. W. Boyd, and E. Karimi, Gen- eration and application of bessel beams in electron microscopy, Ultramicroscopy166, 48 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Shi and Z

    T. Shi and Z. Ding, Multislice method based full-space anal- ysis on mechanical interaction of electron vortex beam with a crystalline particle, Ultramicroscopy238, 113551 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Larocque, I

    H. Larocque, I. Kaminer, V. Grillo, G. Leuchs, M. J. Padgett, R. W. Boyd, M. Segev, and E. Karimi, ‘twisted’electrons, Con- temporary Physics59, 126 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and high- dimensionalquantumcomputing,FrontiersinPhysics 8,589504 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Grillo, T

    V. Grillo, T. R. Harvey, F. Venturi, J. S. Pierce, R. Balboni, F. Bouchard, G. Carlo Gazzadi, S. Frabboni, A. H. Tavabi, Z.- A. Li, et al., Observation of nanoscale magnetic fields using twisted electron beams, Nature communications8, 689 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    N.Dhankhar,A.Mandal,andR.Choubisa,Doubleionizationof heliumbytwistedelectronbeam,JournalofPhysicsB:Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics53, 155203 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Dhankhar and R

    N. Dhankhar and R. Choubisa, Triple-differential cross section forthetwisted-electron-impactionizationofthewatermolecule, Physical Review A105, 062801 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Dhankhar, Neha, and R

    N. Dhankhar, Neha, and R. Choubisa, Dynamics of twisted electron impact ionization of ch4 and nh3 molecule, Atoms11, 82 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Plumadore and A

    A. Plumadore and A. L. Harris, Projectile transverse momen- tum controls emission in electron vortex ionization collisions, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 53, 205205 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    V. P. Kosheleva, V. A. Zaytsev, A. Surzhykov, V. M. Shabaev, and T. Stöhlker, Elastic scattering of twisted electrons by an atomic target: Going beyond the born approximation, Physical Review A98, 022706 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Serbo, I

    V. Serbo, I. P. Ivanov, S. Fritzsche, D. Seipt, and A. Surzhykov, Scattering of twisted relativistic electrons by atoms, Physical Review A92, 012705 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    A. V. Maiorova, S. Fritzsche, R. A. Müller, and A. Surzhykov, Elastic scattering of twisted electrons by diatomic molecules, Physical Review A98, 042701 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Z. Bu, L. Ji, X. Geng, S. Liu, S. Lei, B. Shen, R. Li, and Z. Xu, Generation of quantum vortex electrons with intense laser pulses, Advanced Science11, 2404564 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    R.A.Herring,Anewtwistforelectronbeams,science 331,155 (2011)

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    V.Grillo,E.Karimi,G.C.Gazzadi,S.Frabboni,M.R.Dennis, and R. W. Boyd, Generation of nondiffracting electron bessel beams, Physical Review X4, 011013 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Zinoviev and K

    A. Zinoviev and K. Nordlund, Comparison of repulsive inter- atomic potentials calculated with an all-electron dft approach with experimental data, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms406, 511 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    S.N.Khonina,N.L.Kazanskiy,S.V.Karpeev,andM.A.Butt, Bessel beam: Significance and applications—a progressive re- view, Micromachines11, 997 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    D. V. Karlovets, G. L. Kotkin, V. G. Serbo, and A. Surzhykov, Scatteringoftwistedelectronwavepacketsbyatomsintheborn approximation, Phys. Rev. A95, 032703 (2017)

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Burke and L

    K. Burke and L. O. Wagner, Dft in a nutshell, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry113, 96 (2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    J. Shee, B. Rudshteyn, E. J. Arthur, S. Zhang, D. R. Reichman, and R. A. Friesner, On achieving high accuracy in quantum chemical calculations of 3 d transition metal-containing sys- tems: acomparisonofauxiliary-fieldquantummontecarlowith coupled cluster, density functional theory, and experiment for diatomic molecules, Journal of chemical theory and comp...

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Arulmozhiraja and T

    S. Arulmozhiraja and T. Ohno, Ccsd calculations on c14, c18, and c22 carbon clusters, The Journal of chemical physics128 (2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    Xiao-Niu, S

    Z. Xiao-Niu, S. De-Heng, S. Jin-Feng, and Z. Zun-Lue, Elastic scattering of two ground-state n atoms, Chinese Physics B19, 013501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    Kirrander, Ab initio calculation of total x-ray scattering from molecules, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, 2836 (2019)

    A.MorenoCarrascosa,H.Yong,D.L.Crittenden,P.M.Weber, and A. Kirrander, Ab initio calculation of total x-ray scattering from molecules, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, 2836 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Gallo, F

    A. Gallo, F. Hummel, A. Irmler, and A. Grüneis, A periodic equation-of-motion coupled-cluster implementation applied to f-centers in alkaline earth oxides, The Journal of Chemical Physics154 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    I.Y.ZhangandA.Grüneis,Coupledclustertheoryinmaterials science, Frontiers in Materials6, 123 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Lloyd, M

    S. Lloyd, M. Babiker, and J. Yuan, Quantized orbital angular momentum transfer and magnetic dichroism in the interaction of electron vortices with matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 074802 (2012). 11

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    S. M. Lloyd, M. Babiker, and J. Yuan, Interaction of electron vorticesandopticalvorticeswithmatterandprocessesoforbital angular momentum exchange, Phys. Rev. A86, 023816 (2012)

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    Harris, Projectile coherence effects in twisted electron ion- ization of helium, Atoms11, 79 (2023)

    A. Harris, Projectile coherence effects in twisted electron ion- ization of helium, Atoms11, 79 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    B. H. Bransden and C. J. Joachain, Physics of atoms and molecules(Pearson Education India, 2003)

    work page 2003

  40. [40]

    R.Tweed,Doubleprocessesine-—hecollisions,Zeitschriftfür Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters23, 309 (1992)

    work page 1992

  41. [41]

    Kim and M

    S. Kim and M. Kim, Rotation representations and their conver- sions, IEEE Access11, 6682 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    M. J. F. G. W. T. H. B. S. G. E. Scuseria, Gaussian09 revision e.01, gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT 2009

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    A. D. Becke, Density-functional thermochemistry. iii. the role of exact exchange, The Journal of chemical physics98, 5648 (1993)

    work page 1993

  44. [44]

    Herzberg, Molecular spectra and molecular structure

    G. Herzberg, Molecular spectra and molecular structure. vol. 3: Electronic spectra and electronic structure of polyatomic molecules, New York: Van Nostrand (1966)

    work page 1966

  45. [45]

    V.Špirko,X.Li,andJ.Paldus,Potentialenergycurveofn2re- visited,CollectionofCzechoslovakChemicalCommunications 76, 327 (2011)

    work page 2011

  46. [46]

    Y. Pak, R. C. Woods, and K. A. Peterson, Coupled cluster pre- diction of vibrational band intensities for sif2 and pf2+, The Journal of chemical physics106, 8283 (1997)

    work page 1997

  47. [47]

    Sánchez-Márquez, V

    J. Sánchez-Márquez, V. García, D. Zorrilla, and M. Fernández, Onelectronegativity,hardness,andreactivitydescriptors: anew property-oriented basis set, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A124, 4700 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Lu and F

    T. Lu and F. Chen, Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer, Journal of computational chemistry33, 580 (2012)

    work page 2012

  49. [49]

    I.Iga,J.Nogueira,andL.Mu-Tao,Elasticscatteringofelectrons from co2 in the intermediate energy range, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics17, L185 (1984)

    work page 1984

  50. [50]

    J.P.Bromberg,Absolutedifferentialcrosssectionsofelastically scattered electrons. v. o2 and co2 at 500, 400, and 300 ev, The Journal of Chemical Physics60, 1717 (1974)

    work page 1974

  51. [51]

    Blanco and G

    F. Blanco and G. García, Interference effects in the electron andpositronscatteringfrommoleculesatintermediateandhigh energies, Chemical Physics Letters635, 321 (2015)

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    Dogan, M

    M. Dogan, M. Ulu, Z. N. Ozer, M. Yavuz, and G. Bozkurt, Doubledifferentialcross-sectionsforelectronimpactionization ofatomsandmolecules,JournalofSpectroscopy 2013,192917 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Silverman and E

    S. Silverman and E. Lassettre,Test of the Low-energy Limit of the Born Approximation, 235 (Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Office of Aerospace Research ..., 1966)

    work page 1966

  54. [54]

    A.Russek,Amodifiedbornapproximationformoderate-energy atomic and molecular collisions, Physica48, 165 (1970)

    work page 1970