Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.20127 v2 pith:XYYKLQVR submitted 2024-07-29 hep-ex

classification hep-ex
keywords algorithmstagginguncertaintiesperformanceatlasdetectorlargelearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The identification of top quark decays where the top quark has a large momentum transverse to the beam axis, known as $top$ $tagging$, is a crucial component in many measurements of Standard Model processes and searches for beyond the Standard Model physics at the Large Hadron Collider. Machine learning techniques have improved the performance of top tagging algorithms, but the size of the systematic uncertainties for all proposed algorithms has not been systematically studied. This paper presents the performance of several machine learning based top tagging algorithms on a dataset constructed from simulated proton-proton collision events measured with the ATLAS detector at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV. The systematic uncertainties associated with these algorithms are estimated through an approximate procedure that is not meant to be used in a physics analysis, but is appropriate for the level of precision required for this study. The most performant algorithms are found to have the largest uncertainties, motivating the development of methods to reduce these uncertainties without compromising performance. To enable such efforts in the wider scientific community, the datasets used in this paper are made publicly available.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Virtues and Vices of Equivariant Transformers

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Lorentz-equivariant transformers outperform standard transformers for jet and flavor tagging whenever geometric 4-vector features dominate, and a 48M pretrained equivariant model matches far larger foundation models o...

Pith tools