Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Benchmarking Multi-dimensional AIGC Video Quality Assessment: A Dataset and Unified Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.21408 v2 pith:BNWLEHSO submitted 2024-07-31 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords qualityvideosaigcvideoassessmentdatasetugvqlgvq
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven video generation has gained significant attention. Consequently, there is a growing need for accurate video quality assessment (VQA) metrics to evaluate the perceptual quality of AI-generated content (AIGC) videos and optimize video generation models. However, assessing the quality of AIGC videos remains a significant challenge because these videos often exhibit highly complex distortions, such as unnatural actions and irrational objects. To address this challenge, we systematically investigate the AIGC-VQA problem, considering both subjective and objective quality assessment perspectives. For the subjective perspective, we construct the Large-scale Generated Video Quality assessment (LGVQ) dataset, consisting of 2,808 AIGC videos generated by 6 video generation models using 468 carefully curated text prompts. We evaluate the perceptual quality of AIGC videos from three critical dimensions: spatial quality, temporal quality, and text-video alignment. For the objective perspective, we establish a benchmark for evaluating existing quality assessment metrics on the LGVQ dataset. Our findings show that current metrics perform poorly on this dataset, highlighting a gap in effective evaluation tools. To bridge this gap, we propose the Unify Generated Video Quality assessment (UGVQ) model, designed to accurately evaluate the multi-dimensional quality of AIGC videos. The UGVQ model integrates the visual and motion features of videos with the textual features of their corresponding prompts, forming a unified quality-aware feature representation tailored to AIGC videos. Experimental results demonstrate that UGVQ achieves state-of-the-art performance on the LGVQ dataset across all three quality dimensions. Both the LGVQ dataset and the UGVQ model are publicly available on https://github.com/zczhang-sjtu/UGVQ.git.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VQ-Insight: Teaching VLMs for AI-Generated Video Quality Understanding via Progressive Visual Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VQ-Insight uses progressive reinforcement learning with temporal shuffle and task rewards to teach a vision-language model to score and compare AI-generated videos, with gains on multiple video quality benchmarks.

  2. Multi-Dimensional Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Human-Centric Videos: Dataset and Model

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new large benchmark for AI-generated human-centric video quality with pairwise preferences, plus a Mixture-of-Experts MLLM that outperforms prior methods on rating, comparison, and Q&A.

  3. Efficient Face Image Quality Assessment via Self-training and Knowledge Distillation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A self-trained teacher and knowledge distillation produce a 1.18M-parameter face image quality model that nearly matches the 86.88M-parameter teacher on ICCV 2025 VQualA FIQA challenge data.

  4. Engagement Prediction of Short Videos with Large Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Large multimodal models, especially one that also processes audio, predict short-video engagement better than the prior feature-based baseline on the SnapUGC test set.

Pith tools