Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Gravitational-Wave and Gravitational-Wave Memory Signatures of Core-Collapse Supernovae

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.01525 v3 pith:WIF33TNQ submitted 2024-08-02 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SRgr-qc

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRgr-qc
keywords memorymatterneutrinoccsndetectionfindcomponentdetect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we calculate the energy, signal-to-noise ratio, detection range, and angular anisotropy of the matter, matter memory, and neutrino memory gravitational wave (GW) signatures of 21 three-dimensional initially non-rotating core-collapse supernova (CCSN) models carried to late times. We find that inferred energy, signal-to-noise ratio, and detection range are angle-dependent quantities, and that the spread of possible energy, signal-to-noise, and detection ranges across all viewing angles generally increases with progenitor mass. When examining the low-frequency matter memory and neutrino memory components of the signal, we find that the neutrino memory is the most detectable component of a CCSN GW signal, and that DECIGO is best-equipped to detect both matter memory and neutrino memory. Moreover, we find that the polarization angle between the $h_+$ and $h_{\times}$ strains serves as a unique identifier of matter and neutrino memory. Finally, we develop a galactic density- and stellar mass-weighted formalism to calculate the rate at which we can expect to detect CCSN GW signals with Advanced LIGO. When considering only the matter component of the signal, the aLIGO detection rate is around 24$\%$ of the total galactic supernova rate, but increases to 92$\%$ when incorporating the neutrino memory component. We find that all future detectors (ET, CE, DECIGO) will be able to detect CCSN GW signals from the entire galaxy, and for the higher-mass progenitors even into the local group of galaxies.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A "Neutrino Fog" For Gravitational Waves: The Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background from Supernova Neutrino Memory

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using 3D supernova simulations, the authors predict that neutrino memory creates a gravitational wave background with Omega_GW around 1e-16 at 0.1 Hz, within reach of future space-based detectors.

  2. The Gravitational-Wave Power Gap in Core-Collapse Supernovae: Insights from 60 Axisymmetric Simulations

    astro-ph.HE 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The gravitational-wave power-gap frequency in core-collapse supernova simulations correlates with inner protoneutron-star properties and may arise from Fano-type interference.

  3. Toward More Realistic Machine-Learning Inference of the Dense-Matter Equation of State from Supernova Gravitational Waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-03 conditional novelty 4.5 of 10

    Using a linear SVM, EOS classification from bounce gravitational waves remains robust to real noise, progenitor diversity, and bounce-time uncertainty in the frequency domain, but collapses in the time domain under ti...

  4. Parameter Estimation Horizon of Core-Collapse Supernovae with a Network of Gravitational-Wave Detectors

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A CNN can recover supernova peak frequency out to about 30 kpc and rotation/amplitude out to 200-250 kpc with current networks, extending to roughly 300 kpc and 2-2.5 Mpc with third-generation detectors.

Pith tools