Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimally generating $\mathfrak{su}(2^N)$ using Pauli strings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.03294 v3 pith:47IEIXTQ submitted 2024-08-06 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords generatingmathfrakpaulisetscomputationquantumratesequence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Any quantum computation consists of a sequence of unitary evolutions described by a finite set of Hamiltonians. When this set is taken to consist of only products of Pauli operators, we show that the minimal such set generating $\mathfrak{su}(2^{N})$ contains $2N+1$ elements. We provide a number of examples of such generating sets and furthermore provide an algorithm for producing a sequence of rotations corresponding to any given Pauli rotation, which is shown to have optimal complexity. We also observe that certain sets generate $\mathfrak{su}(2^{N})$ at a faster rate than others, and we show how this rate can be optimized by tuning the fraction of anticommuting pairs of generators. Finally, we briefly comment on implications for measurement-based and trapped ion quantum computation as well as the construction of fault-tolerant gate sets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Classical optimization algorithms for diagonalizing quantum Hamiltonians

    quant-ph 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors prove a benign optimization landscape for a Pauli-based diagonalization cost, but the claimed new family of efficiently diagonalizable Hamiltonians is invalid as stated because its 'diagonal' D includes Y ...

Pith tools