Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

An Analysis of Automated Use Case Component Extraction from Scenarios using ChatGPT

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.03395 v1 pith:APKKKURQ submitted 2024-08-06 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords componentsdevelopmentrequirementsscenariosactivitiesappscasedeveloped
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mobile applications (apps) are often developed by only a small number of developers with limited resources, especially in the early years of the app's development. In this setting, many requirements acquisition activities, such as interviews, are challenging or lower priority than development and release activities. Moreover, in this early period, requirements are frequently changing as mobile apps evolve to compete in the marketplace. As app development companies move to standardize their development processes, however, they will shift to documenting and analyzing requirements. One low-cost source of requirements post-deployment are user-authored scenarios describing how they interact with an app. We propose a method for extracting use case components from user-authored scenarios using large language models (LLMs). The method consists of a series of prompts that were developed to improve precision and recall on a ground truth dataset of 50 scenarios independently labeled with UC components. Our results reveal that LLMs require additional domain knowledge to extract UC components, and that refining prompts to include this knowledge improves the quality of the extracted UC components.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. If You Had to Pitch Your Ideal Software -- Evaluating Large Language Models to Support User Scenario Writing for User Experience Experts and Laypersons

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Laypeople using an LLM writing assistant produced user scenarios rated as high in structure and clarity as those written by UX experts.

Pith tools