Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Interference Resurrection of the $\tau$ Dipole through Quantum Tomography

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.04553 v2 pith:27L24W4D submitted 2024-08-08 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords quantumsensitivityobservablesphysicsinformationinterferencecontributionsdipole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Helicity selection rules can suppress the leading contributions from dimension-6 operators in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT), reducing sensitivity to potential new physics. This paper explores how the interference contributions from the $\tau$ lepton's anomalous dipole moment are restored in different observable, in particular comparing the sensitivity to SMEFT operators of quantum information observables and more traditional spin correlations. We compute the sensitivity of various observables-including entanglement measures, Bell inequality violations, and quantum uncertainties-to new physics effects using Monte Carlo simulations. Spin correlation observables are found to outperform both the integrated cross-section and quantum information observables in sensitivity to both $CP$-conserving and -violating effects, improving the sensitivity to the scale of new physics by up to a factor of 3. Our results suggest that quantum information observables are suboptimal probes for resurrecting the interference, and more in general to disentangle the $CP$ properties of new physics

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Colliders are Testing neither Locality via Bell's Inequality nor Entanglement versus Non-Entanglement

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Collider measurements of final-state momenta alone cannot certify Bell nonlocality or entanglement, because the measured angular distribution is itself a local hidden variable model.

Pith tools