Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Zero-Shot Uncertainty Quantification using Diffusion Probabilistic Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.04718 v1 pith:CWA2XEVG submitted 2024-08-08 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords diffusionpredictionensemblemodelsregressionaccuracyuncertaintyerror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The success of diffusion probabilistic models in generative tasks, such as text-to-image generation, has motivated the exploration of their application to regression problems commonly encountered in scientific computing and various other domains. In this context, the use of diffusion regression models for ensemble prediction is becoming a practice with increasing popularity. Under such background, we conducted a study to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of ensemble methods on solving different regression problems using diffusion models. We consider the ensemble prediction of a diffusion model as a means for zero-shot uncertainty quantification, since the diffusion models in our study are not trained with a loss function containing any uncertainty estimation. Through extensive experiments on 1D and 2D data, we demonstrate that ensemble methods consistently improve model prediction accuracy across various regression tasks. Notably, we observed a larger accuracy gain in auto-regressive prediction compared with point-wise prediction, and that enhancements take place in both the mean-square error and the physics-informed loss. Additionally, we reveal a statistical correlation between ensemble prediction error and ensemble variance, offering insights into balancing computational complexity with prediction accuracy and monitoring prediction confidence in practical applications where the ground truth is unknown. Our study provides a comprehensive view of the utility of diffusion ensembles, serving as a useful reference for practitioners employing diffusion models in regression problem-solving.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Round-Trip Consistency: Bidirectional Diffusion Models Can Predict Their Own Rollout Errors

    stat.ML 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A model's forward-then-backward round-trip error predicts, without ensembles or ground truth, how large its actual rollout error will be.

  2. DAV-GSWT: Diffusion-Active-View Sampling for Data-Efficient Gaussian Splatting Wang Tiles

    cs.CV 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    DAV-GSWT uses diffusion priors and active view sampling to synthesize high-fidelity Gaussian Splatting Wang Tiles from minimal observations while preserving visual quality and tile transitions.

  3. Perfecting Depth: Uncertainty-Aware Enhancement of Metric Depth

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Perfecting Depth is a two-stage pipeline that uses diffusion-sample variance to flag unreliable depth pixels and a deterministic network to refine them, beating monocular baselines on indoor depth inpainting and noisy...

Pith tools