The trouble with pilot-wave theory: a critical evaluation

Antony Valentini

arxiv: 2408.05403 · v1 · submitted 2024-08-10 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.hist-ph

The trouble with pilot-wave theory: a critical evaluation

Antony Valentini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 22:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.hist-ph

keywords pilot-wave theorynonequilibriumde Broglie-Bohm theoryBorn rulequantum foundationsmeasurementLorentz invariance

0 comments

The pith

Pilot-wave theory should be understood as a generalised nonequilibrium theory empirically distinct from quantum mechanics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper evaluates objections to pilot-wave theory that fall into three mutually contradictory categories: that the theory is too bizarrely different from ordinary physics, that it is not different enough, or that it is after all the same as quantum physics. It shows that these objections often misunderstand or overlook the radical nature of the theory's dynamics and its implications for measurement, Lorentz invariance, conservation laws, and the Born rule. After reviewing the theory and re-examining Einstein's early work on it, the paper concludes that pilot-wave theory is best treated on its own terms as a generalised nonequilibrium framework with potentially revolutionary implications.

Core claim

Pilot-wave theory is a generalised nonequilibrium theory that is empirically distinct from quantum mechanics, with novel dynamics that are not equivalent to standard quantum theory and that carry implications beyond the usual interpretations.

What carries the argument

The nonequilibrium generalization of pilot-wave dynamics, which extends the standard de Broglie-Bohm theory and permits empirical distinctions from quantum mechanics through deviations from the Born rule.

If this is right

The dynamics imply a new understanding of the measurement process that does not reduce to standard quantum rules.
Lorentz invariance and conservation laws must be assessed separately within the nonequilibrium framework rather than assumed from quantum mechanics.
The Born rule holds only in equilibrium states and is not a fundamental axiom.
Einstein's historical reasons for turning away from the theory no longer apply under current understanding.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Searches for nonequilibrium effects could provide direct tests of the theory's distinct predictions.
This framing may prompt re-evaluation of other hidden-variable approaches in quantum foundations.
It opens the possibility of applying the nonequilibrium view to domains like cosmology where equilibrium assumptions might not hold.

Load-bearing premise

The three categories of objections to pilot-wave theory are mutually contradictory and that its radical nature is frequently overlooked or misunderstood in the literature.

What would settle it

An experimental detection of deviations from the Born rule in a controlled pilot-wave system that match the nonequilibrium predictions would support the claim of empirical distinction.

read the original abstract

Objections to pilot-wave theory frequently come in three mutually-contradictory categories: that the theory is too bizarrely different from ordinary physics, that the theory is not radically different enough, and that the physics of pilot-wave theory is after all just the same as quantum physics. After a brief review of pilot-wave theory, we critically evaluate these objections. We show how the radical nature of pilot-wave theory is often misunderstood or overlooked. We highlight the novelty of its dynamics, and clarify its implications for our understanding of measurement, as well as discussing the status of Lorentz invariance, conservation laws, and the Born rule. We examine Einstein's early work on pilot-wave theory and argue that he turned away from it for reasons which are no longer compelling. We urge that the theory be understood on its own terms, as a generalised nonequilibrium theory empirically distinct from quantum mechanics, with all its potentially revolutionary implications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Valentini sorts objections to pilot-wave theory into three contradictory categories and urges treating it as an empirically distinct nonequilibrium framework, but the paper is mostly a synthesis of prior arguments.

read the letter

Valentini groups common objections to pilot-wave theory into three buckets that cannot all hold at once: the theory is too different from ordinary physics, not different enough, or ultimately just quantum mechanics. The paper reviews the basic setup, then argues that the radical features of the guidance equation and configuration-space dynamics are often missed, with knock-on effects for how measurement and invariance are understood. It also revisits Einstein's early engagement and shows why his stated reasons for dropping the approach no longer look decisive. The closing recommendation is to treat the theory as a generalized nonequilibrium extension that could deviate from quantum predictions in testable ways. That framing is consistent and draws on the author's earlier nonequilibrium work without contradiction. The historical section on Einstein adds a useful angle that is not always highlighted in the literature. The sections on Lorentz invariance, conservation laws, and the Born rule stay close to the standard formulation and avoid overclaiming. The main limitation is that the paper does not introduce new derivations, calculations, or experimental proposals. The mutual-contradiction claim is presented as a logical observation rather than a formal proof, and the empirical-distinctness point largely restates the nonequilibrium possibility without fresh evidence or falsifiable predictions. The citation pattern tracks the relevant pilot-wave literature without obvious omissions. This is the sort of piece that would be read by people already working in quantum foundations who want a consolidated view of the debates. It is coherent on its own terms and shows clear engagement with the material, so it deserves referee time as a perspective or review article even though it will not shift the technical landscape.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that objections to pilot-wave theory fall into three mutually contradictory categories (too different from ordinary physics, not different enough, and ultimately the same as quantum physics). After reviewing the theory, it evaluates these objections by highlighting the radical nature of its dynamics, clarifying implications for measurement, Lorentz invariance, conservation laws, and the Born rule, reexamines Einstein's early work, and concludes that the theory should be understood on its own terms as a generalized nonequilibrium theory that is empirically distinct from quantum mechanics.

Significance. If the central arguments hold, the paper provides a coherent framework for addressing persistent misconceptions in quantum foundations literature. It strengthens the case for treating pilot-wave theory as a nonequilibrium generalization with potentially revolutionary empirical implications, while crediting the established framework and avoiding new ad-hoc parameters or entities. This interpretive clarification could facilitate more precise discussions of the theory's distinct predictions.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract introduces the three objection categories but does not name them explicitly; adding one-sentence descriptors for each would improve immediate clarity for readers.
The discussion of Einstein's rejection could include more precise citations to primary sources (e.g., specific letters or papers) to allow readers to verify the claim that the reasons are no longer compelling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment. We are pleased that the central arguments were viewed as providing a coherent framework for clarifying misconceptions about pilot-wave theory, and we appreciate the recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper is a critical review essay that classifies existing objections into three categories, reviews the standard pilot-wave framework, and advocates interpreting it as a nonequilibrium generalization. No derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are presented that could reduce to self-definitions or inputs by construction. Self-references to the author's prior nonequilibrium work serve only as contextual background and are not invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes that close any logical loop. The central claims rest on historical analysis and conceptual clarification rather than any self-referential chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on the standard domain assumptions of pilot-wave theory without introducing new free parameters, axioms beyond the theory's foundations, or invented entities; the evaluation is interpretive rather than derivational.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Pilot-wave theory describes particles with definite trajectories guided by a wave function evolving via the Schrödinger equation.
This is the core framework being defended against objections, invoked throughout the evaluation of dynamics and measurement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5672 in / 1213 out tokens · 20185 ms · 2026-05-23T22:20:29.197110+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

As another example, Cohen et al

lanatio n provided by de Broglie’s dynamics is simply that the Aristotelian force ∇ S vanishes there. As another example, Cohen et al. (2020) express concern that pilo t-wave theory violates Newton’s ﬁrst law (the principle of inertia), and prop ose that this and related disturbing features be avoided by adopting a retro causal model. There is, however, n...

work page 2020
[2]

The experimental results are the same, it is only the interpretation and signiﬁcance of those results that diﬀer s

Furthermore, at the end of the experiment the eﬀective wave fun ction of the particle is still ψ0(x), with eigenvalue ω = p2/2m, and the true kinetic energy is 8Over an equilibrium ensemble the distribution of ﬁnal point er positions of course agrees with standard quantum mechanics. The experimental results are the same, it is only the interpretation and ...

work page 1966
[3]

Quantum measurements can b e framed (for example) in terms of pilot-wave theory, which is highly nonclassic al

We now know that this is not correct. Quantum measurements can b e framed (for example) in terms of pilot-wave theory, which is highly nonclassic al. But in the early twentieth century the views of Bohr and Heisenberg dom inated the interpretation of quantum physics. As a result, quantum measure ments were modelled on a formal analogy with classical measu...

work page 1992
[4]

As yet there is no evidence for such breakdown, but it seems reasonable to explore the possibility both t heoretically and experimentally

inwhich Lorentz invariance breaks down at high energies. As yet there is no evidence for such breakdown, but it seems reasonable to explore the possibility both t heoretically and experimentally. In high-energy physics, Lorentz invariance is m erely one important symmetry of the Lagrangian, among others, which may o r may not be fundamental. In contrast, ...

work page 1995
[5]

We recover the usual statistical conservation laws only in the equilibrium limit ρ = |ψ|2

d ⟨E⟩ dt = d ⣨ ˆH ⟩ dt + ∫ d3x (ρ − |ψ|2) ∂Q ∂t , d ⟨p⟩ dt = d ⟨ˆ p⟩ dt + ∫ d3x (ρ − |ψ|2)(− ∇ V − ∇ Q) , where ⣨ ˆH ⟩ and ⟨ˆ p⟩ are the usual quantum averages. We recover the usual statistical conservation laws only in the equilibrium limit ρ = |ψ|2. It is noteworthy that, even in standard quantum mechanics, ener gy-momentum conservation generally holds ...

work page 1993
[6]

suggests that this is unsatisfactory and that the theory sh ould be repaired by incorporating a back reaction from the conﬁguration q to the wave ψ. In our view this concern arises from rewriting de Broglie’s dynamics in an a rtiﬁcial pseudo-Newtonian form, which as we have noted is in any case unsta ble and therefore physically untenable. There is no gen...

work page 1973
[7]

(de Broglie 1927; Bacciagaluppi an d Valentini 2009, pp. 55–67). 22 submitted for publication but withdrawn before it appeared in print ( Kirsten and Treder 1979, p. 135; Pais 1979, p. 901). The manuscript surv ives, however, in the Einstein archive (Howard 1990, pp. 89–90; Belousek 1996). W hy the paper was withdrawn is not known. The manuscript has a no...

work page 1927
[8]

These concerns and diﬃculties mirror those Einstein had with quantu m the- ory itself. From his calculations of statistical ﬂuctuations in blackbo dy radia- tion, as early as 1909 Einstein understood that spatially-separate d light quanta could not behave independently, and he encountered similar diﬃcultie s in the early 1920s for photons in a cavity with...

work page 1909
[9]

Einstein’s objection, that a theory grounded in conﬁguration spac e does not oﬀer a natural description of a separable and local physics, ca n in fact be turned around

– an object that is generally nonseparable. Einstein’s objection, that a theory grounded in conﬁguration spac e does not oﬀer a natural description of a separable and local physics, ca n in fact be turned around. On current evidence, we may argue in favour of a fundamental dynamics in conﬁguration space, since this can provide a natural un derstanding of ...

work page 1958
[10]

t hought it unacceptable, asserting that a wave in conﬁguration space canno t be a real ob- ject because (so Heisenberg claimed) ‘things’ exist in ordinary 3-sp ace and not in conﬁguration space. Pilot-wave theory suggests otherwise: th e true arena of physics lies in conﬁguration space, a view that is reinforced by the fu ndamental role played by the glo...

work page 1986
[11]

24 undiminished by distance

are unconvincing, since ψ contains a lot of independent and contingent structure (Val entini 1992, 2010b, 2020; Brown and W allace 2005), noting that even in qua ntum gravity and quantum cosmology there is an inﬁnity of solutions for ψ. 24 undiminished by distance. It seems that entangled systems are con nected di- rectly, by means of the pilot wave in co...

work page 1992
[12]

poured scorn on this proposal, sarcastically compa ring it to the 26 hope that 2 × 2 = 5 so that we could improve our ﬁnancial situation. But in fact, there is no need for arbitrary changes to the dynamics: as it stand s the theory already contains an extended nonequilibrium physics, in which the unc ertainty principle is broken and the underlying traject...

work page 1992
[13]

would have radical technological implications, including the breaking of quantum cryptography and ne w forms of computation (Valentini 2002b), as well as superluminal signalling ( Valentini 1991b). The possibility of primordial nonequilibrium oﬀers a possible ex pla- nation for reported large-scale anomalies in the cosmic microwave ba ckground (Valentini ...

work page 2015
[14]

and by Brown and W allace (2005, p. 527). 18There should be no need to explain why a microscopic system, w hose quantum state is a superposition of eigenstates with eigenvalues ωn, does not occupy parallel realities simulta- neously. As we have seen, from a pilot-wave perspective the ωn generally have no ontological status. A misguided ‘eigenvalue realism...

work page 2005
[15]

Despite this deepening of our understanding, the objections and m isunder- standings continue

There can be little doubt that pilot-wave theory teaches us important lessons wh ich may well remain valid even if the theory itself should turn out to be incorrect. Despite this deepening of our understanding, the objections and m isunder- standings continue. Even so, over the last thirty years pilot-wave theory has been able to provide new approaches to...

work page 2005
[16]

Appleby, D. M. (1999), Bohmian trajectories post-decoherence , Foundations of Physics 29,

work page 1999
[17]

and Valentini, A

31 Bacciagaluppi, G. and Valentini, A. (2009), Quantum Theory at the Cross- roads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference , Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press. Bell, J. S. (1964), On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Physics 1,

work page 2009
[18]

Bell, J. S. (1966), On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mech anics, Reviews of Modern Physics 38,

work page 1966
[19]

Bell, J. S. (1987), Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press. Bell, J. S. (1990), Against ‘measurement’, in Sixty-Two Years of Uncer- tainty: Historical, Philosophical, and Physical Inquirie s into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , A. I. Miller (ed.), New York: Plenum Press. [Reprinted: Bell, J. S. (199...

work page 1987
[20]

D¨ urr, S

Berndl, K., D. D¨ urr, S. Goldstein and N. Zangh ` ı (1996), Nonlocality, Lorentz invariance, and Bohmian quantum theory, Physical Review A 53,

work page 1996
[21]

(1953), Proof that probability density approaches |ψ|2 in causal interpretation of the quantum theory, Physical Review 89,

Bohm, D. (1953), Proof that probability density approaches |ψ|2 in causal interpretation of the quantum theory, Physical Review 89,

work page 1953
[22]

and Hiley, B

Bohm, D. and Hiley, B. J. (1989), Non-locality and locality in the stoch astic interpretation of quantum mechanics, Physics Reports 172,

work page 1989
[23]

Bohm, D., Hiley, B. J. and Kaloyerou, P. N. (1987), An ontological ba sis for the quantum theory, Physics Reports 144,

work page 1987
[24]

and Vigier, J

Bohm, D. and Vigier, J. P. (1954), Model of the causal interpreta tion of quantum theory in terms of a ﬂuid with irregular ﬂuctuations, Physical Review 96,

work page 1954
[25]

(1931), Maxwell and modern theoretical physics, Nature 128,

Bohr, N. (1931), Maxwell and modern theoretical physics, Nature 128,

work page 1931
[26]

Brown, H. R. (1996), Mindful of quantum possibilities, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47,

work page 1996
[27]

Brown, H. R. and Wallace, D. (2005), Solving the measurement prob lem: de Broglie–Bohm loses out to Everett, Foundations of Physics 35,

work page 2005
[28]

and Smolin, L

Cohen, E., Cortˆ es, M., Elitzur, A. and Smolin, L. (2020), Realism andcausal- ity. I. Pilot wave and retrocausal models as possible facilitators, Physical Review D 102, 124027. Colin, S. (2012), Relaxation to quantum equilibrium for Dirac fermions in the de Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave theory, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 468,

work page 2020
[29]

and Valentini, A

Colin, S. and Valentini, A. (2013), Mechanism for the suppression of quan- tum noise at large scales on expanding space, Physical Review D 88, 103515. Colin, S. and Valentini, A. (2014), Instability of quantum equilibrium in Bohm’s dynamics, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 470, 20140288. 32 Colin, S. and Valentini, A. (2015), Primordial quantum nonequi...

work page 2013
[30]

(1924), Recherches sur la th´ eorie des quanta, PhD thesis, University of Paris

de Broglie, L. (1924), Recherches sur la th´ eorie des quanta, PhD thesis, University of Paris. de Broglie, L. (1925), Recherches sur la th´ eorie des quanta, Annales de Physique (10), 3,

work page 1924
[31]

(1927), La m´ ecanique ondulatoire et la structure at omique de la mati` ere et du rayonnement,Le Journal de Physique et le Radium , (6) 8,

de Broglie, L. (1927), La m´ ecanique ondulatoire et la structure at omique de la mati` ere et du rayonnement,Le Journal de Physique et le Radium , (6) 8,

work page 1927
[32]

(1928), La nouvelle dynamique des quanta, in ´Electrons et Photons: Rapports et Discussions du Cinqui` eme Conseil de P hysique, Paris: Gauthier-Villars

de Broglie, L. (1928), La nouvelle dynamique des quanta, in ´Electrons et Photons: Rapports et Discussions du Cinqui` eme Conseil de P hysique, Paris: Gauthier-Villars. [English translation: Bacciagaluppi and Valentini (2 009).] Deutsch, D. (1996), Comment on Lockwood, British Journal for the Philos- ophy of Science 47,

work page 1928
[33]

and Squires, E

Dewdney, C., Hardy, L. and Squires, E. J. (1993), How late measur ements of quantum trajectories can fool a detector, Physics Letters A 184,

work page 1993
[34]

(2021), Justifying Born’s rule Pα = |Ψα|2 using deterministic chaos, decoherence, and the de Broglie-Bohm quantum theory, Entropy 23,

Drezet, A. (2021), Justifying Born’s rule Pα = |Ψα|2 using deterministic chaos, decoherence, and the de Broglie-Bohm quantum theory, Entropy 23,

work page 2021
[35]

and Zanghi, N

D¨ urr, D., Goldstein, S., M¨ unch-Berndl, K. and Zanghi, N. (1999), Hyper- surface Bohm-Dirac models, Physical Review A 60,

work page 1999
[36]

and Zangh ` ı, N

D¨ urr, D., Goldstein, S., Norsen, T., Struyve, W. and Zangh ` ı, N. (2014), Can Bohmian mechanics be made relativistic?, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 470, 20130699. D¨ urr, D., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R. and Zangh ` ı, N. (2004), Bohmian me- chanics and quantum ﬁeld theory, Physical Review Letters 93, 090402. D¨ urr, D., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R. ...

work page 2014
[37]

(1997), Bohmian mechanicsand the meaning of the wave function, in Experimental Metaphysics: Quantum Mechan- ical Studies for Abner Shimony , R

D¨ urr, D., Goldstein, S., and Zangh ` ı, N. (1997), Bohmian mechanicsand the meaning of the wave function, in Experimental Metaphysics: Quantum Mechan- ical Studies for Abner Shimony , R. S. Cohen, M. Horne and J. Stachel (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer. D¨ urr, D. and Struyve, W. (2021), Typicality in the foundations of statistical physics and Born’s rule, in...

work page 1997
[38]

(1949), Autobiographical Notes, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher- Scientist, P

33 Einstein, A. (1949), Autobiographical Notes, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher- Scientist, P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Illinois: Open Court. Einstein, A. (1952), letter to Max Born, 12 May 1952, in The Born-Einstein Letters, trans. I. Born, 1971, London: Macmillan, p

work page 1949
[39]

O., S¨ ussmann, G

Englert, B.-G., Scully, M. O., S¨ ussmann, G. and Walther, H. (1992), Surre- alistic Bohm trajectories, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Naturforschung47a,

work page 1992
[40]

(1986), The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Fine, A. (1986), The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Goldstein, S. (2021), Bohmian mechanics, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.). [https://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/fall2021/entries/qm- bohm/] Goldstein, S. and Zangh ` ı, N. (2013), Reality and th...

work page 1986
[41]

(1992), Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, an d Lorentz- invariant realistic theories, Physical Review Letters 68,

Hardy, L. (1992), Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, an d Lorentz- invariant realistic theories, Physical Review Letters 68,

work page 1992
[42]

(1958), Physics and Philosophy: the Revolution in Modern Science, New York: Harper & Brothers

Heisenberg, W. (1958), Physics and Philosophy: the Revolution in Modern Science, New York: Harper & Brothers. Heisenberg, W. (1971), Physics and Beyond , New York: Harper & Row. Holland, P. R. (1993), The Quantum Theory of Motion: an Account of the de Broglie-Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press. Hollan...

work page 1958
[43]

(2009), Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point, Physical Review D 79, 084008

Hoˇ rava, P. (2009), Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point, Physical Review D 79, 084008. Howard, D. (1990), ‘Nicht sein kann was nicht sein darf’, or the preh istory of EPR, 1909–1935: Einstein’s early worries about the quantum mec hanics of composite systems, in Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty , A. I. Miller (ed.), New York: Plenum Press. Kandhadai, A. and...

work page 2009
[44]

and Treder, H

Kirsten, C. and Treder, H. J. (1979), Albert Einstein in Berlin 1913–1933 , Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. Kochen, S. and Specker, E. P. (1967), The problem of hidden varia bles in quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17,

work page 1979
[45]

Kosteleck´ y, V. A. and Mewes, M. (2002), Signals for Lorentz viola tion in electrodynamics, Physical Review D 66, 056005. Liddle, A. R. and Lyth, D. H. (2000), Cosmological Inﬂation and Large-Scale Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 34 Lustosa, F. B., Pinto-Neto, N. and Valentini, A. (2023), Evolution o f quan- tum non-equilibrium for coup...

work page 2002
[46]

(2021), The de Broglie-Bohm quantum theory and it s appli- cation to quantum cosmology, Universe 7,

Pinto-Neto, N. (2021), The de Broglie-Bohm quantum theory and it s appli- cation to quantum cosmology, Universe 7,

work page 2021
[47]

and Fabris, J

Pinto-Neto, N. and Fabris, J. C. (2013), Quantum cosmology from the de Broglie–Bohm perspective, Classical and Quantum Gravity 30, 143001. Pinto-Neto, N. and Sergio Santini, E. (2002), The consistency of c ausal quantum geometrodynamics and quantum ﬁeld theory, General Relativity and Gravitation 34,

work page 2013
[48]

F., Barrett, J

Pusey, M. F., Barrett, J. and Rudolph, T. (2012), On the reality of the quantum state, Nature Physics 8,

work page 2012
[49]

(1984), Controllable and uncontrollable non-locality, in Foun- dations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology , S

Shimony, A. (1984), Controllable and uncontrollable non-locality, in Foun- dations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology , S. Kamefuchi et al. (eds.), Tokyo: Physical Society of Japan. Struyve, W. and Valentini, A. (2009), De Broglie-Bohm guidance equ ations for arbitrary Hamiltonians, Journal of Physics A 42, 035301. Towler, M. D., Russell,...

work page 1984
[50]

(2007), The ‘unromantic pictures’ of quantum theory , Journal of Physics A 40,

Tumulka, R. (2007), The ‘unromantic pictures’ of quantum theory , Journal of Physics A 40,

work page 2007
[51]

(2021), Bohmian mechanics, in The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics , E

Tumulka, R. (2021), Bohmian mechanics, in The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics , E. Knox and A. Wilson (eds.), New York: Routledge. Tumulka, R. (2022), Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , Cham: Springer. Underwood, N. G. (2018), Extreme quantum nonequilibrium, nodes , vortic- ity, drift and relaxation retarding states, Journal of Physics A ...

work page 2021
[52]

(1992), On the pilot-wave theory of classical, quantum and subquantum physics, PhD thesis, International School for Adva nced Studies, Trieste, Italy

Valentini, A. (1992), On the pilot-wave theory of classical, quantum and subquantum physics, PhD thesis, International School for Adva nced Studies, Trieste, Italy. [http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11767/4334] Valentini, A. (1996), Pilot-wave theory of ﬁelds, gravitation and co smology, in Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum theory: an Appraisal , J. T. Cushing, A...

work page 1992
[53]

(2001), Hidden variables, statistical mechanics and th e early universe, in Chance in Physics: Foundations and Perspectives , J

Valentini, A. (2001), Hidden variables, statistical mechanics and th e early universe, in Chance in Physics: Foundations and Perspectives , J. Bricmont et al. (eds.), Berlin: Springer. Valentini, A. (2002a), Signal-locality in hidden-variables theories, Physics Letters A 297,

work page 2001
[54]

Black Holes, Information Loss, and Hidden Variables

Valentini, A. (2004), Black holes, information loss, and hidden variab les, arXiv:hep-th/0407032. Valentini, A. (2007), Astrophysical and cosmological tests of qua ntum the- ory, Journal of Physics A 40,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[55]

(2008), Hidden variables and the large-scale structur e of space- time, in Einstein, Relativity and Absolute Simultaneity , W

Valentini, A. (2008), Hidden variables and the large-scale structur e of space- time, in Einstein, Relativity and Absolute Simultaneity , W. L. Craig and Q. Smith (eds.), London: Routledge. Valentini, A. (2010a), Inﬂationary cosmology as a probe of primord ial quan- tum mechanics, Physical Review D 82, 063513. Valentini, A. (2010b), De Broglie-Bohm pilot-...

work page arXiv 2008
[56]

(2024), De Broglie-Bohm quantum mechanics, in Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, 2nd edition , Amsterdam: Elsevier

Valentini, A. (2024), De Broglie-Bohm quantum mechanics, in Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, 2nd edition , Amsterdam: Elsevier. Valentini, A. (2025a), De Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave theory, in Oxford Re- search Encyclopedia of Physics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [https://oxfordre.com/phys ics] Valentini, A. (2025b), Beyond the Quantum: a Quest for ...

work page 2024
[57]

Vigier, J. P. (1985), Nonlocal quantum potential interpretation o f relativistic actions at a distance in many-body problems, in Open Questions in Quantum Physics: Invited Papers on the Foundations of Microphysics , G. Tarozzi and A. van der Merwe (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel. Vitenti, S., Peter, P. and Valentini, A. (2019), Modeling the large-sc ale power d...

work page 1985
[58]

Zurek, W. H. (1998), Decoherence, chaos, quantum-classical c orrespondence, and the algorithmic arrow of time, Physica Scripta T76,

work page 1998
[59]

Zurek, W. H. (2003), Decoherence, einselection, and the quantu m origins of the classical, Reviews of Modern Physics 75,

work page 2003
[60]

H., Habib, S

Zurek, W. H., Habib, S. and Paz, J. P. (1993), Coherent states via decoher- ence, Physical Review Letters 70,

work page 1993

[1] [1]

As another example, Cohen et al

lanatio n provided by de Broglie’s dynamics is simply that the Aristotelian force ∇ S vanishes there. As another example, Cohen et al. (2020) express concern that pilo t-wave theory violates Newton’s ﬁrst law (the principle of inertia), and prop ose that this and related disturbing features be avoided by adopting a retro causal model. There is, however, n...

work page 2020

[2] [2]

The experimental results are the same, it is only the interpretation and signiﬁcance of those results that diﬀer s

Furthermore, at the end of the experiment the eﬀective wave fun ction of the particle is still ψ0(x), with eigenvalue ω = p2/2m, and the true kinetic energy is 8Over an equilibrium ensemble the distribution of ﬁnal point er positions of course agrees with standard quantum mechanics. The experimental results are the same, it is only the interpretation and ...

work page 1966

[3] [3]

Quantum measurements can b e framed (for example) in terms of pilot-wave theory, which is highly nonclassic al

We now know that this is not correct. Quantum measurements can b e framed (for example) in terms of pilot-wave theory, which is highly nonclassic al. But in the early twentieth century the views of Bohr and Heisenberg dom inated the interpretation of quantum physics. As a result, quantum measure ments were modelled on a formal analogy with classical measu...

work page 1992

[4] [4]

As yet there is no evidence for such breakdown, but it seems reasonable to explore the possibility both t heoretically and experimentally

inwhich Lorentz invariance breaks down at high energies. As yet there is no evidence for such breakdown, but it seems reasonable to explore the possibility both t heoretically and experimentally. In high-energy physics, Lorentz invariance is m erely one important symmetry of the Lagrangian, among others, which may o r may not be fundamental. In contrast, ...

work page 1995

[5] [5]

We recover the usual statistical conservation laws only in the equilibrium limit ρ = |ψ|2

d ⟨E⟩ dt = d ⣨ ˆH ⟩ dt + ∫ d3x (ρ − |ψ|2) ∂Q ∂t , d ⟨p⟩ dt = d ⟨ˆ p⟩ dt + ∫ d3x (ρ − |ψ|2)(− ∇ V − ∇ Q) , where ⣨ ˆH ⟩ and ⟨ˆ p⟩ are the usual quantum averages. We recover the usual statistical conservation laws only in the equilibrium limit ρ = |ψ|2. It is noteworthy that, even in standard quantum mechanics, ener gy-momentum conservation generally holds ...

work page 1993

[6] [6]

suggests that this is unsatisfactory and that the theory sh ould be repaired by incorporating a back reaction from the conﬁguration q to the wave ψ. In our view this concern arises from rewriting de Broglie’s dynamics in an a rtiﬁcial pseudo-Newtonian form, which as we have noted is in any case unsta ble and therefore physically untenable. There is no gen...

work page 1973

[7] [7]

(de Broglie 1927; Bacciagaluppi an d Valentini 2009, pp. 55–67). 22 submitted for publication but withdrawn before it appeared in print ( Kirsten and Treder 1979, p. 135; Pais 1979, p. 901). The manuscript surv ives, however, in the Einstein archive (Howard 1990, pp. 89–90; Belousek 1996). W hy the paper was withdrawn is not known. The manuscript has a no...

work page 1927

[8] [8]

These concerns and diﬃculties mirror those Einstein had with quantu m the- ory itself. From his calculations of statistical ﬂuctuations in blackbo dy radia- tion, as early as 1909 Einstein understood that spatially-separate d light quanta could not behave independently, and he encountered similar diﬃcultie s in the early 1920s for photons in a cavity with...

work page 1909

[9] [9]

Einstein’s objection, that a theory grounded in conﬁguration spac e does not oﬀer a natural description of a separable and local physics, ca n in fact be turned around

– an object that is generally nonseparable. Einstein’s objection, that a theory grounded in conﬁguration spac e does not oﬀer a natural description of a separable and local physics, ca n in fact be turned around. On current evidence, we may argue in favour of a fundamental dynamics in conﬁguration space, since this can provide a natural un derstanding of ...

work page 1958

[10] [10]

t hought it unacceptable, asserting that a wave in conﬁguration space canno t be a real ob- ject because (so Heisenberg claimed) ‘things’ exist in ordinary 3-sp ace and not in conﬁguration space. Pilot-wave theory suggests otherwise: th e true arena of physics lies in conﬁguration space, a view that is reinforced by the fu ndamental role played by the glo...

work page 1986

[11] [11]

24 undiminished by distance

are unconvincing, since ψ contains a lot of independent and contingent structure (Val entini 1992, 2010b, 2020; Brown and W allace 2005), noting that even in qua ntum gravity and quantum cosmology there is an inﬁnity of solutions for ψ. 24 undiminished by distance. It seems that entangled systems are con nected di- rectly, by means of the pilot wave in co...

work page 1992

[12] [12]

poured scorn on this proposal, sarcastically compa ring it to the 26 hope that 2 × 2 = 5 so that we could improve our ﬁnancial situation. But in fact, there is no need for arbitrary changes to the dynamics: as it stand s the theory already contains an extended nonequilibrium physics, in which the unc ertainty principle is broken and the underlying traject...

work page 1992

[13] [13]

would have radical technological implications, including the breaking of quantum cryptography and ne w forms of computation (Valentini 2002b), as well as superluminal signalling ( Valentini 1991b). The possibility of primordial nonequilibrium oﬀers a possible ex pla- nation for reported large-scale anomalies in the cosmic microwave ba ckground (Valentini ...

work page 2015

[14] [14]

and by Brown and W allace (2005, p. 527). 18There should be no need to explain why a microscopic system, w hose quantum state is a superposition of eigenstates with eigenvalues ωn, does not occupy parallel realities simulta- neously. As we have seen, from a pilot-wave perspective the ωn generally have no ontological status. A misguided ‘eigenvalue realism...

work page 2005

[15] [15]

Despite this deepening of our understanding, the objections and m isunder- standings continue

There can be little doubt that pilot-wave theory teaches us important lessons wh ich may well remain valid even if the theory itself should turn out to be incorrect. Despite this deepening of our understanding, the objections and m isunder- standings continue. Even so, over the last thirty years pilot-wave theory has been able to provide new approaches to...

work page 2005

[16] [16]

Appleby, D. M. (1999), Bohmian trajectories post-decoherence , Foundations of Physics 29,

work page 1999

[17] [17]

and Valentini, A

31 Bacciagaluppi, G. and Valentini, A. (2009), Quantum Theory at the Cross- roads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference , Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press. Bell, J. S. (1964), On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Physics 1,

work page 2009

[18] [18]

Bell, J. S. (1966), On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mech anics, Reviews of Modern Physics 38,

work page 1966

[19] [19]

Bell, J. S. (1987), Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press. Bell, J. S. (1990), Against ‘measurement’, in Sixty-Two Years of Uncer- tainty: Historical, Philosophical, and Physical Inquirie s into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , A. I. Miller (ed.), New York: Plenum Press. [Reprinted: Bell, J. S. (199...

work page 1987

[20] [20]

D¨ urr, S

Berndl, K., D. D¨ urr, S. Goldstein and N. Zangh ` ı (1996), Nonlocality, Lorentz invariance, and Bohmian quantum theory, Physical Review A 53,

work page 1996

[21] [21]

(1953), Proof that probability density approaches |ψ|2 in causal interpretation of the quantum theory, Physical Review 89,

Bohm, D. (1953), Proof that probability density approaches |ψ|2 in causal interpretation of the quantum theory, Physical Review 89,

work page 1953

[22] [22]

and Hiley, B

Bohm, D. and Hiley, B. J. (1989), Non-locality and locality in the stoch astic interpretation of quantum mechanics, Physics Reports 172,

work page 1989

[23] [23]

Bohm, D., Hiley, B. J. and Kaloyerou, P. N. (1987), An ontological ba sis for the quantum theory, Physics Reports 144,

work page 1987

[24] [24]

and Vigier, J

Bohm, D. and Vigier, J. P. (1954), Model of the causal interpreta tion of quantum theory in terms of a ﬂuid with irregular ﬂuctuations, Physical Review 96,

work page 1954

[25] [25]

(1931), Maxwell and modern theoretical physics, Nature 128,

Bohr, N. (1931), Maxwell and modern theoretical physics, Nature 128,

work page 1931

[26] [26]

Brown, H. R. (1996), Mindful of quantum possibilities, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47,

work page 1996

[27] [27]

Brown, H. R. and Wallace, D. (2005), Solving the measurement prob lem: de Broglie–Bohm loses out to Everett, Foundations of Physics 35,

work page 2005

[28] [28]

and Smolin, L

Cohen, E., Cortˆ es, M., Elitzur, A. and Smolin, L. (2020), Realism andcausal- ity. I. Pilot wave and retrocausal models as possible facilitators, Physical Review D 102, 124027. Colin, S. (2012), Relaxation to quantum equilibrium for Dirac fermions in the de Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave theory, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 468,

work page 2020

[29] [29]

and Valentini, A

Colin, S. and Valentini, A. (2013), Mechanism for the suppression of quan- tum noise at large scales on expanding space, Physical Review D 88, 103515. Colin, S. and Valentini, A. (2014), Instability of quantum equilibrium in Bohm’s dynamics, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 470, 20140288. 32 Colin, S. and Valentini, A. (2015), Primordial quantum nonequi...

work page 2013

[30] [30]

(1924), Recherches sur la th´ eorie des quanta, PhD thesis, University of Paris

de Broglie, L. (1924), Recherches sur la th´ eorie des quanta, PhD thesis, University of Paris. de Broglie, L. (1925), Recherches sur la th´ eorie des quanta, Annales de Physique (10), 3,

work page 1924

[31] [31]

(1927), La m´ ecanique ondulatoire et la structure at omique de la mati` ere et du rayonnement,Le Journal de Physique et le Radium , (6) 8,

de Broglie, L. (1927), La m´ ecanique ondulatoire et la structure at omique de la mati` ere et du rayonnement,Le Journal de Physique et le Radium , (6) 8,

work page 1927

[32] [32]

(1928), La nouvelle dynamique des quanta, in ´Electrons et Photons: Rapports et Discussions du Cinqui` eme Conseil de P hysique, Paris: Gauthier-Villars

de Broglie, L. (1928), La nouvelle dynamique des quanta, in ´Electrons et Photons: Rapports et Discussions du Cinqui` eme Conseil de P hysique, Paris: Gauthier-Villars. [English translation: Bacciagaluppi and Valentini (2 009).] Deutsch, D. (1996), Comment on Lockwood, British Journal for the Philos- ophy of Science 47,

work page 1928

[33] [33]

and Squires, E

Dewdney, C., Hardy, L. and Squires, E. J. (1993), How late measur ements of quantum trajectories can fool a detector, Physics Letters A 184,

work page 1993

[34] [34]

(2021), Justifying Born’s rule Pα = |Ψα|2 using deterministic chaos, decoherence, and the de Broglie-Bohm quantum theory, Entropy 23,

Drezet, A. (2021), Justifying Born’s rule Pα = |Ψα|2 using deterministic chaos, decoherence, and the de Broglie-Bohm quantum theory, Entropy 23,

work page 2021

[35] [35]

and Zanghi, N

D¨ urr, D., Goldstein, S., M¨ unch-Berndl, K. and Zanghi, N. (1999), Hyper- surface Bohm-Dirac models, Physical Review A 60,

work page 1999

[36] [36]

and Zangh ` ı, N

D¨ urr, D., Goldstein, S., Norsen, T., Struyve, W. and Zangh ` ı, N. (2014), Can Bohmian mechanics be made relativistic?, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 470, 20130699. D¨ urr, D., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R. and Zangh ` ı, N. (2004), Bohmian me- chanics and quantum ﬁeld theory, Physical Review Letters 93, 090402. D¨ urr, D., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R. ...

work page 2014

[37] [37]

(1997), Bohmian mechanicsand the meaning of the wave function, in Experimental Metaphysics: Quantum Mechan- ical Studies for Abner Shimony , R

D¨ urr, D., Goldstein, S., and Zangh ` ı, N. (1997), Bohmian mechanicsand the meaning of the wave function, in Experimental Metaphysics: Quantum Mechan- ical Studies for Abner Shimony , R. S. Cohen, M. Horne and J. Stachel (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer. D¨ urr, D. and Struyve, W. (2021), Typicality in the foundations of statistical physics and Born’s rule, in...

work page 1997

[38] [38]

(1949), Autobiographical Notes, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher- Scientist, P

33 Einstein, A. (1949), Autobiographical Notes, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher- Scientist, P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Illinois: Open Court. Einstein, A. (1952), letter to Max Born, 12 May 1952, in The Born-Einstein Letters, trans. I. Born, 1971, London: Macmillan, p

work page 1949

[39] [39]

O., S¨ ussmann, G

Englert, B.-G., Scully, M. O., S¨ ussmann, G. and Walther, H. (1992), Surre- alistic Bohm trajectories, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Naturforschung47a,

work page 1992

[40] [40]

(1986), The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Fine, A. (1986), The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Goldstein, S. (2021), Bohmian mechanics, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.). [https://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/fall2021/entries/qm- bohm/] Goldstein, S. and Zangh ` ı, N. (2013), Reality and th...

work page 1986

[41] [41]

(1992), Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, an d Lorentz- invariant realistic theories, Physical Review Letters 68,

Hardy, L. (1992), Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, an d Lorentz- invariant realistic theories, Physical Review Letters 68,

work page 1992

[42] [42]

(1958), Physics and Philosophy: the Revolution in Modern Science, New York: Harper & Brothers

Heisenberg, W. (1958), Physics and Philosophy: the Revolution in Modern Science, New York: Harper & Brothers. Heisenberg, W. (1971), Physics and Beyond , New York: Harper & Row. Holland, P. R. (1993), The Quantum Theory of Motion: an Account of the de Broglie-Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press. Hollan...

work page 1958

[43] [43]

(2009), Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point, Physical Review D 79, 084008

Hoˇ rava, P. (2009), Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point, Physical Review D 79, 084008. Howard, D. (1990), ‘Nicht sein kann was nicht sein darf’, or the preh istory of EPR, 1909–1935: Einstein’s early worries about the quantum mec hanics of composite systems, in Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty , A. I. Miller (ed.), New York: Plenum Press. Kandhadai, A. and...

work page 2009

[44] [44]

and Treder, H

Kirsten, C. and Treder, H. J. (1979), Albert Einstein in Berlin 1913–1933 , Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. Kochen, S. and Specker, E. P. (1967), The problem of hidden varia bles in quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17,

work page 1979

[45] [45]

Kosteleck´ y, V. A. and Mewes, M. (2002), Signals for Lorentz viola tion in electrodynamics, Physical Review D 66, 056005. Liddle, A. R. and Lyth, D. H. (2000), Cosmological Inﬂation and Large-Scale Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 34 Lustosa, F. B., Pinto-Neto, N. and Valentini, A. (2023), Evolution o f quan- tum non-equilibrium for coup...

work page 2002

[46] [46]

(2021), The de Broglie-Bohm quantum theory and it s appli- cation to quantum cosmology, Universe 7,

Pinto-Neto, N. (2021), The de Broglie-Bohm quantum theory and it s appli- cation to quantum cosmology, Universe 7,

work page 2021

[47] [47]

and Fabris, J

Pinto-Neto, N. and Fabris, J. C. (2013), Quantum cosmology from the de Broglie–Bohm perspective, Classical and Quantum Gravity 30, 143001. Pinto-Neto, N. and Sergio Santini, E. (2002), The consistency of c ausal quantum geometrodynamics and quantum ﬁeld theory, General Relativity and Gravitation 34,

work page 2013

[48] [48]

F., Barrett, J

Pusey, M. F., Barrett, J. and Rudolph, T. (2012), On the reality of the quantum state, Nature Physics 8,

work page 2012

[49] [49]

(1984), Controllable and uncontrollable non-locality, in Foun- dations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology , S

Shimony, A. (1984), Controllable and uncontrollable non-locality, in Foun- dations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology , S. Kamefuchi et al. (eds.), Tokyo: Physical Society of Japan. Struyve, W. and Valentini, A. (2009), De Broglie-Bohm guidance equ ations for arbitrary Hamiltonians, Journal of Physics A 42, 035301. Towler, M. D., Russell,...

work page 1984

[50] [50]

(2007), The ‘unromantic pictures’ of quantum theory , Journal of Physics A 40,

Tumulka, R. (2007), The ‘unromantic pictures’ of quantum theory , Journal of Physics A 40,

work page 2007

[51] [51]

(2021), Bohmian mechanics, in The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics , E

Tumulka, R. (2021), Bohmian mechanics, in The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics , E. Knox and A. Wilson (eds.), New York: Routledge. Tumulka, R. (2022), Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , Cham: Springer. Underwood, N. G. (2018), Extreme quantum nonequilibrium, nodes , vortic- ity, drift and relaxation retarding states, Journal of Physics A ...

work page 2021

[52] [52]

(1992), On the pilot-wave theory of classical, quantum and subquantum physics, PhD thesis, International School for Adva nced Studies, Trieste, Italy

Valentini, A. (1992), On the pilot-wave theory of classical, quantum and subquantum physics, PhD thesis, International School for Adva nced Studies, Trieste, Italy. [http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11767/4334] Valentini, A. (1996), Pilot-wave theory of ﬁelds, gravitation and co smology, in Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum theory: an Appraisal , J. T. Cushing, A...

work page 1992

[53] [53]

(2001), Hidden variables, statistical mechanics and th e early universe, in Chance in Physics: Foundations and Perspectives , J

Valentini, A. (2001), Hidden variables, statistical mechanics and th e early universe, in Chance in Physics: Foundations and Perspectives , J. Bricmont et al. (eds.), Berlin: Springer. Valentini, A. (2002a), Signal-locality in hidden-variables theories, Physics Letters A 297,

work page 2001

[54] [54]

Black Holes, Information Loss, and Hidden Variables

Valentini, A. (2004), Black holes, information loss, and hidden variab les, arXiv:hep-th/0407032. Valentini, A. (2007), Astrophysical and cosmological tests of qua ntum the- ory, Journal of Physics A 40,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

[55] [55]

(2008), Hidden variables and the large-scale structur e of space- time, in Einstein, Relativity and Absolute Simultaneity , W

Valentini, A. (2008), Hidden variables and the large-scale structur e of space- time, in Einstein, Relativity and Absolute Simultaneity , W. L. Craig and Q. Smith (eds.), London: Routledge. Valentini, A. (2010a), Inﬂationary cosmology as a probe of primord ial quan- tum mechanics, Physical Review D 82, 063513. Valentini, A. (2010b), De Broglie-Bohm pilot-...

work page arXiv 2008

[56] [56]

(2024), De Broglie-Bohm quantum mechanics, in Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, 2nd edition , Amsterdam: Elsevier

Valentini, A. (2024), De Broglie-Bohm quantum mechanics, in Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, 2nd edition , Amsterdam: Elsevier. Valentini, A. (2025a), De Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave theory, in Oxford Re- search Encyclopedia of Physics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [https://oxfordre.com/phys ics] Valentini, A. (2025b), Beyond the Quantum: a Quest for ...

work page 2024

[57] [57]

Vigier, J. P. (1985), Nonlocal quantum potential interpretation o f relativistic actions at a distance in many-body problems, in Open Questions in Quantum Physics: Invited Papers on the Foundations of Microphysics , G. Tarozzi and A. van der Merwe (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel. Vitenti, S., Peter, P. and Valentini, A. (2019), Modeling the large-sc ale power d...

work page 1985

[58] [58]

Zurek, W. H. (1998), Decoherence, chaos, quantum-classical c orrespondence, and the algorithmic arrow of time, Physica Scripta T76,

work page 1998

[59] [59]

Zurek, W. H. (2003), Decoherence, einselection, and the quantu m origins of the classical, Reviews of Modern Physics 75,

work page 2003

[60] [60]

H., Habib, S

Zurek, W. H., Habib, S. and Paz, J. P. (1993), Coherent states via decoher- ence, Physical Review Letters 70,

work page 1993